CornwallRam Posted May 30, 2016 Share Posted May 30, 2016 8 minutes ago, Rampage said: CornwallRam... what a guy. Brilliant work Pearson is not a big spender and with the help of Walsh he has made some great signings. The future in the transfer market has taken an upturn The window before that - which was his first back at Leicester Wes Morgan Nottm Forest £844k Ben Marshall Stoke City £825k Danny Drinkwater Manchester Utd.£675k Nathan Delfouneso Aston Villa Loan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rampage Posted May 30, 2016 Share Posted May 30, 2016 2 minutes ago, CornwallRam said: The window before that - which was his first back at Leicester Wes Morgan Nottm Forest £844k Ben Marshall Stoke City £825k Danny Drinkwater Manchester Utd.£675k Nathan Delfouneso Aston Villa Loan Pearson and/or his scouts are obviously first rate. It is also obvious that fans may not have been impressed until they saw how he got them playing.So best for us to keep quiet to save apologising opportunities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srg Posted May 30, 2016 Share Posted May 30, 2016 Just now, Rampage said: Pearson and/or his scouts are obviously first rate. It is also obvious that fans may not have been impressed until they saw how he got them playing.So best for us to keep quiet to save apologising opportunities. Hindsight is 20/20 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rampage Posted May 30, 2016 Share Posted May 30, 2016 Just now, Srg said: Hindsight is 20/20 Promotion is 2016/2017 A proven record is a proven record. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srg Posted May 30, 2016 Share Posted May 30, 2016 11 minutes ago, Rampage said: Promotion is 2016/2017 A proven record is a proven record. It is, but my point was the fact you can look back on players signing all over the place and say whether they were a success or not. There's no way to know at the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eddie Posted May 30, 2016 Share Posted May 30, 2016 1 hour ago, Rampage said: Pearson's midfield (442) - I personally think that it will not fly:- Rhea, Cassowary, Ostrich, Emu No wingers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CornwallRam Posted May 30, 2016 Share Posted May 30, 2016 3 minutes ago, Srg said: It is, but my point was the fact you can look back on players signing all over the place and say whether they were a success or not. There's no way to know at the time. So you're saying that signings are only good if they seem good at the time and it's irrelevant how they actually turn out? Err..? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eddie Posted May 30, 2016 Share Posted May 30, 2016 21 minutes ago, Srg said: Hindsight is 20/20 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rampage Posted May 30, 2016 Share Posted May 30, 2016 4 minutes ago, eddie said: 1 hour ago, Rampage said: Pearson's midfield (442) - I personally think that it will not fly:- Rhea, Cassowary, Ostrich, Emu All good players but who is going to foot the bill? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srg Posted May 30, 2016 Share Posted May 30, 2016 4 minutes ago, CornwallRam said: So you're saying that signings are only good if they seem good at the time and it's irrelevant how they actually turn out? Err..? No, that's basically the opposite of what I'm saying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
needles Posted May 30, 2016 Share Posted May 30, 2016 However the midfield lines up, the first name down is Will Hughes. He's the best in the club with certainty, and probably the best in the division. Players that good can play in any formation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alph Posted May 30, 2016 Share Posted May 30, 2016 4 hours ago, eddie said: You know when they run analyses on the telly, and they join players together with a line, it's not actually like that in real life. I know, if it was then you wouldn't get caught out position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FoxInPeace Posted May 30, 2016 Share Posted May 30, 2016 do you have the players to play a 3-4-1-2? Pearson used this formation to keep us up.. Might suit Hughes & Thorne better too as Hughes will have the cover of 3 cb's behind him.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ossieram Posted May 30, 2016 Share Posted May 30, 2016 14 minutes ago, FoxInPeace said: do you have the players to play a 3-4-1-2? Pearson used this formation to keep us up.. Might suit Hughes & Thorne better too as Hughes will have the cover of 3 cb's behind him.. Hughes would probably be the one behind the front 2 in that formation or at least in the middle of the 4, but hopefully not in a defensive mode. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eddie Posted May 30, 2016 Share Posted May 30, 2016 1 hour ago, Alpha said: I know, if it was then you wouldn't get caught out position. It's a thought though - what a choice for defenders. Head, tackle or clothesline? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ossieram Posted May 30, 2016 Share Posted May 30, 2016 1 minute ago, eddie said: It's a thought though - what a choice for defenders. Head, tackle or clothesline? We all know Buckos preferred option, just ask the treetards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BottrillRAM Posted May 30, 2016 Share Posted May 30, 2016 28 minutes ago, FoxInPeace said: do you have the players to play a 3-4-1-2? Pearson used this formation to keep us up.. Might suit Hughes & Thorne better too as Hughes will have the cover of 3 cb's behind him.. 3-4-1-2 would be very good for us I think!, Our full backs are very attacking so would be good to use on the wings and would also track back, but we would need another RB/RM in for cover, Hendrick/Thorne/Johnson/Butterfield/Hughes? can all play in the 2 CM spots, and then the attacking mid can be Bryson/Ince/Hughes?, behind 2 ST's Martin/Russell, Bent/Weimann, Camara/Blackman! Hughes has a ? because he could play in both roles! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
valleyram Posted May 30, 2016 Share Posted May 30, 2016 We are all being silly here , muespech ram is the only guy on here that could pick the perfect 4 ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
archied Posted May 31, 2016 Share Posted May 31, 2016 Well for me I'm going to be ultra patient with Pearson if needed and I'm not going to nessesarily look at signings or players he leaves out or puts in in a singular way ,, from what I've seen Pearson builds TEAMS so judging a player / signing or who gets picked ahead of who on the basis of who we think is a better player may not be the best yardstick ,, in short I really trust Pearson to put together a bloody good team given time to get the blend and attitudes right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mwram1973 Posted May 31, 2016 Share Posted May 31, 2016 13 hours ago, valleyram said: We are all being silly here , muespech ram is the only guy on here that could pick the perfect 4 ? And still find summat to moan about Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.