Quagga Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 The key question that I haven't seen raised elsewhere yet - is what happens if there's a dispute over the contractual interpretation of the Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramarena Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 The key question that I haven't seen raised elsewhere yet - is what happens if there's a dispute over the contractual interpretation of the Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mafiabob Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 1.5 to 2m tops me thinks as I mentioned earlier..... Would be fanciful if anymore! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
North_Stand_Ram Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 If this is all true about Bryson's party reporting us to the PFA, then sell him, obviously for as much as he can. He clearly hasn't got the clubs well being at heart and even though he's been a great servant to the club, not player is bigger than the club, Nixons source is quite clearly Brysons agent, and he knows/believes that it was a buyout clause, where as the DET and BBC Radio Derby journalist and clearly getting a club point of view from their sources, which is where the conflicting views come from. Who knows who's right? I certainly don't. Nixon has a pretty good record with us but clearly thinks he's gods gift with transfer stories, where as Owen Bradley and Steve Nicholson are pretty much always spot on with DCFC. We shall have to see. I'd sell for anything above Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JackTheRam Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 #BrysonWatch "http://i.gyazo.com/cc9764ecf9b95d8e2be3619b614babc6" alt="cc9764ecf9b95d8e2be3619b614babc6"> He's still here so is sammon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramafan Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 I would be really disappointed if Bryson went to Burnley to me Burnley are not a bigger club than us, they will struggle in the Premier League next season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DcFc Dyycheee Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 #BrysonWatch #BuckoBeardWatch"http://i.gyazo.com/6a8292ec77eb0b9dab0b3d594e4617fc" alt="6a8292ec77eb0b9dab0b3d594e4617fc"> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PistoldPete2 Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 If this is all true about Bryson's party reporting us to the PFA, then sell him, obviously for as much as he can. He clearly hasn't got the clubs well being at heart and even though he's been a great servant to the club, not player is bigger than the club, Nixons source is quite clearly Brysons agent, and he knows/believes that it was a buyout clause, where as the DET and BBC Radio Derby journalist and clearly getting a club point of view from their sources, which is where the conflicting views come from. Who knows who's right? I certainly don't. Nixon has a pretty good record with us but clearly thinks he's gods gift with transfer stories, where as Owen Bradley and Steve Nicholson are pretty much always spot on with DCFC. We shall have to see. I'd sell for anything above Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eddie Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 Bucko Beard Watch? That beard consists entirely of bees. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
North_Stand_Ram Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 Not sure that Nixon's source is Brysons agent, it might be Burnley stirring things up. It doesnts ound (YET) like the Thorne situation as there's nothing to say the player has asked for a transfer. Or that , having been rejected first off , Burnley have increased their bid and that's been rejected too. In any case WBA fans still seem adamant Thorne is staying. Didnt suarez have a clause , Arsenal offered Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trevor1946 Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 our previous scouts were rubbish only looked at cheap Scottish players,cant see what the fuss is about. at least we will make a profit on him,not like previous players when we had to give them away,to lessen the wage bill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaspode Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 #BrysonWatch "http://i.gyazo.com/cc9764ecf9b95d8e2be3619b614babc6" alt="cc9764ecf9b95d8e2be3619b614babc6"> He's still here you can see Jeff running alongside him - "will yus just sign the fecking contract, go on, go on, go on!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martyn Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 I'm pretty sure it is. He knows what the players wants, the state of play and who else is interested in the player. And yet he got the contract clause wrong. My guess also is he's being fed from Burnley. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rams_man Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 And yet he got the contract clause wrong. My guess also is he's being fed from Burnley. How do you know he got the clause wrong? None of us know that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ilkleyram Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 The key question that I haven't seen raised elsewhere yet - is what happens if there's a dispute over the contractual interpretation of the Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ambitious Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 First two Burnley signings - Sordell and Kightly. You'd have to be honest and say they have absolutely no ambition of staying up. I could be wrong, but that's two incredible signings for a Premier League team - not good incredible either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingsy1884 Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 https://vine.co/v/MtLwIJXwE1n Its okay Bryson is still here. In training today and Bucko is 'having a word' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StaffsRam Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 First two Burnley signings - Sordell and Kightly. You'd have to be honest and say they have absolutely no ambition of staying up. I could be wrong, but that's two incredible signings for a Premier League team - not good incredible either. Looks like they're shaping up for another season back in the Championship before too long.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martyn Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 How do you know he got the clause wrong? None of us know that 1. Derby rejected Burnley's bid. 2. The likelihood of Derby knowing what's in the contract vs the likelihood of Burnley knowing what's in the contract. "http://mrsstuder.pbworks.com/f/1220568067/pizza%20hut" alt="pizza%20hut"> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rams_man Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 1. Derby rejected Burnley's bid. 2. The likelihood of Derby knowing what's in the contract vs the likelihood of Burnley knowing what's in the contract."http://mrsstuder.pbworks.com/f/1220568067/pizza%20hut" alt="pizza%20hut"> That doesnt mean there is no clause there, Suarez had one which Liverpool admited to uet still rejected all bids for him. This could be Derby doing the same Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.