sage Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 The owners on Rush's recommendation? The owners and Rush defended Clough to no avail? Or everyone suddenly had the same idea at the same time? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cisse Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 I bet on Rush. Clough cut the wage bill to no end so the board members should love him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CumbrianRam Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 It pretty obvious that Rush and NC never saw eye to eye. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacko1983 Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 the owners pay Rush to make decisions, this isn't hand egg or punch hockey. they know a lot about money and nothing else.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacko1983 Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 W.Brett Wilson was on the american version of dragons den for three years. the kind of people on them shows HATE losing money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uttoxram75 Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 Its down to Rush. The owners may put some pressure on in the background but they are not close enough to the day to day running of the club to make the decisions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eddie Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 It pretty obvious that Rush and NC never saw eye to eye. When I went to see Rush when I argued the case for disabled season ticket holders last March, his first question to me was "What is your opinion of Nigel Clough?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
notts_ram Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 The owners. Rush just does their dirty work for them. They are the ones who stand to lose the most Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cisse Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 Wilson owns a part of Nashville Predators too and they are making incredibly stupid things there also. He should lay off the sports. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alph Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 I think the pressure is on Rush to get us our PL payday. I think he's listened to fans concerns and then decided he himself isn't very convinced by our performances. I think he's put forward a name that he feels will be able to take this team on and they've trusted him I think he was brought in to hurry the process. There's no money in this league. He's trying to get results too. No evidence btw. This is all just throwing ideas out there? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sage Posted September 28, 2013 Author Share Posted September 28, 2013 When I went to see Rush when I argued the case for disabled season ticket holders last March, his first question to me was "What is your opinion of Nigel Clough?" What did you say? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 What did you say? Give him to last week in sept Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mozza Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 Give him to last week in sept then get Moyes in.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alph Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 Ironically Brett Wilson sends Rush here to gather our opinions and watch our mixed results and then sits on twitter wondering why he's getting mixed response. Obviously Brett Wilson knows money. But I'm pretty sure he's not qualified to talk **** about football. Well, football the game. Played on grass. Not on paper. Watched by tribal lifelong fans. Not soccer spectators. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eddie Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 What did you say? I said that in my opinion, Clough was doing a good job with one hand tied behind his back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DcfcNews12 Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 When I went to see Rush when I argued the case for disabled season ticket holders last March, his first question to me was "What is your opinion of Nigel Clough?" If your being serious that is very interesting.maybe they were waiting for a time in which the clough haters in numbers were there highest and loosing to the red dogs always creates a couple Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ladyram Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 Whoevers idea it was, I think they've misjudged the timing of it, aswell as the mood after it was announced. Did they think that if we lost to Forest today the mood would be such that nobody would be bothered by Nigel going? That they could quietly announce it and go about their business like nothing had happened? Pfft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StaffsRam Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 Whoevers idea it was, I think they've misjudged the timing of it, aswell as the mood after it was announced. Did they think that if we lost to Forest today the mood would be such that nobody would be bothered by Nigel going? Wouldn't surprise me if they thought that they could play on the negative emotional response of losing today as a way of blunting the impact of sacking Nigel. It's cynical, it's two-faced, it's gutless, therefore it's probably true..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 One thing I don't get is why sack him after this game, I'm not his biggest fan, but given the history between the two clubs and of course his dad, surely it would have been better to do it after Tuesday or the next loss. This game will now be remembered as the end, rather than some shitty meaningless game, which in which truth be told meant more to him that we probably know; poor timing IMO, and I wanted him out :-( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
notts_ram Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 Whoevers idea it was, I think they've misjudged the timing of it, aswell as the mood after it was announced. Did they think that if we lost to Forest today the mood would be such that nobody would be bothered by Nigel going? That they could quietly announce it and go about their business like nothing had happened? Pfft. I think they maybe could have underestimated the mood as well if they thought that they needed to camoflauge the sacking on the back of losing against Forest, am sure theyre a lot of folks whom wouldnt have cared about needed this smokescreen at all to get rid of Clough Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.