t'oldu Posted September 4, 2012 Share Posted September 4, 2012 The latest football club to fall foul of their American Owners Business Plan Manchester City owners are making similar noises. And then there is Villa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hucknall Ram Posted September 4, 2012 Share Posted September 4, 2012 The latest football club to fall foul of their American Owners Business Plan Manchester City owners are making similar noises. And then there is Villa You mean Man Utd? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
t'oldu Posted September 4, 2012 Author Share Posted September 4, 2012 NO - Man City are making similar 'no more wild spending' type noises I thought they had got in Glick to help them make the most of the Commercial possibilities that come with winning the Premier league. But maybe there were other reasons !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackNwhites Posted September 4, 2012 Share Posted September 4, 2012 Liverpool spent £35m and £20m on Carroll and Henderson respectively. How much did they spend on Suarez? £25m? Whatever is happening at Liverpool, Dalglish should shoulder the blame for blowing so much cash on unproven players. None of those players have repaid anything near their price tag. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derbydan Posted September 4, 2012 Share Posted September 4, 2012 The same Man city that splashed £54million in the last few days of the transfer window?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davenportram Posted September 4, 2012 Share Posted September 4, 2012 Is it the Foreign model that is floored or are these clubs realising that past models are flawed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pearl Ram Posted September 4, 2012 Share Posted September 4, 2012 The same Man city that splashed £54million in the last few days of the transfer window?? The same Man City that Skysports News were saying are considering a 95 million quid bid for the "unhappy" Christiano Ronaldo ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
t'oldu Posted September 4, 2012 Author Share Posted September 4, 2012 Maybe they think he would be self-financing in commercial sales and goals ?? In general the Manager has reportedly been told to cut the squad size, cut the wages bill, and work towards balancing the books - in line with UEFA's FFP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hucknall Ram Posted September 4, 2012 Share Posted September 4, 2012 NO - Man City are making similar 'no more wild spending' type noises I thought they had got in Glick to help them make the most of the Commercial possibilities that come with winning the Premier league. But maybe there were other reasons !! It just when said "American Owners Business Plan", City are owned by united Arab Emirati and untied are owned by yanks, throwing a curve ball in there? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duracell Posted September 7, 2012 Share Posted September 7, 2012 Is it the Foreign model that is floored or are these clubs realising that past models are flawed? Your spelling of flawed is floored. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davenportram Posted September 7, 2012 Share Posted September 7, 2012 Your spelling of flawed is floored. I corrected it the second time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrsRam Posted September 25, 2012 Share Posted September 25, 2012 http://i290.photobucket.com/albums/ll268/rammy65/150128_10151242167979515_226292952_n Made me laff....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MuespachRam Posted September 25, 2012 Share Posted September 25, 2012 That is brilliant....Also just seen this..... @FootballFunnys: A scumbag, a racist, a cheat walk into a bar. The barman says: "What can I get you Mr Suarez?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MuespachRam Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 David brent = brendan rogers = david brent. Embarrassing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sage Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 David brent = brendan rogers = david brent. Embarrassing. Your hatred of all things Liverpool is disturbing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MuespachRam Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 Your hatred of all things Liverpool is disturbing. I dont hate all things to do with liverpool, i have completely changed my mind on jamie carracher, he is now my tip for the next liverpool manager who will actually win something. Rogers, well, i take it you didnt see it then? Because he was david brent, really really embarrassing, i was cringing watching him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sage Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 I dont hate all things to do with liverpool, i have completely changed my mind on jamie carracher, he is now my tip for the next liverpool manager who will actually win something. Rogers, well, i take it you didnt see it then? Because he was david brent, really really embarrassing, i was cringing watching him. Did he dance to MC Hammer? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.