Chris_Martin

It's so easy to just blame everything on Warne. And lazy. He picked a side that should be beating Crewe comfortably, but the players didn't bring enough quality or effort, the grown adult footballers we employ should have enough professionalism to be able to perform better than that, even if the tactics are suboptimal. Warne isn't faultless, but why do we let the players off the hook? 

I blame Warne, the players, and the tea lady. Just blaming the players and Warne is lazy.

if we keep the ball, we use less energy running after it all the time. Maybe someone should tell warne

if we keep the ball, we use less energy running after it all the time. Maybe someone should tell warne

Crouch is too much of a technical player for warne

What instructions ?

no i don't. 
thats more of a cop out than anything else

i would argue he doesn't even with NML

So the running round a lot and cross it in over and over hasn't worked again, 
Warne shifts to the only other tactic he knows, gung ho.

i would argue he doesn't even with NML

Without Mendez-Laing I'm not sure Warne knows what to do offensively. This is what happens when you play so one-dimensionally - if a player is missing or the opposition figure out how to counter it, that's it. It's just embarrassing that its Crewe who've worked out how to counter it. 

So the running round a lot and cross it in over and over hasn't worked again, 
Warne shifts to the only other tactic he knows, gung ho.

If we somehow make it through now, I'm willing to go to my fridge, get a beer, and drink the whole thing. That's how confident I am.

Embarrassed by Crewe not just once, but twice in the space of 10 days.
Paul Warne taking Derby County to new lows

So the running round a lot and cross it in over and over hasn't worked again, 
Warne shifts to the only other tactic he knows, gung ho.

whats the point though? We don't keep the ball at all. It's completely unsustainable for players to keep chasing the ball all game every game. It's impossible.

i would argue he's not adapted at all

I'm trying to be more diplomatic these days.

i would argue he's not adapted at all

Warne is used to being the underdog, and has the mentality that you're more likely to win if you work harder than the other team to make up for the difference in talent.
And he's had success with that in the past, and he's taking time to adapt to the management of more talented players.

they actually have the ball over 60% of the time though so it makes it a lot easier for them.
Warne seems to like not having the ball and for his players to just run all game chasing it

why does our entire game hinge on running round a lot though...

they actually have the ball over 60% of the time though so it makes it a lot easier for them.
Warne seems to like not having the ball and for his players to just run all game chasing it

why does our entire game hinge on running round a lot though...

The first to spring to mind is the one and only Chris Martin