Gary Teale Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 Is he still at the club? Injured or just totally out of the picture? I don't known why this popped into my head either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sage Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 Still out injured. Out of contract in the summer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CumbrianRam Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 Geting a wage for naff all, nice work if you can get it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Teale Posted March 16, 2012 Author Share Posted March 16, 2012 Geting a wage for naff all, nice work if you can get it. Sad thing is he will be on more than most of us, a player that has never been able to down a first team place anywhere even at burton when they were in the conference Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asanovic Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 Bless his Saul. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
randombc Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 'Injured' but he's been 'injured' for over a year now, doesn't take that long to recover from a dislocated shoulder, even been no words of 'progress' Got an image of him looking something like this sitting watching tv http://resources0.news.com.au/images/2010/10/25/1225943/067912-josh-filbay Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
randombc Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 Will be released in the summer and end up back burton or somewhere similar i'd say Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCFC_17 Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 He was a good shot stopper but anything else he was avergae Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CumbrianRam Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 Will be released in the summer and end up back burton or somewhere similar i'd say Considering Burton released him, I'd doubt they'd want him back. Will probably go to the UniBond League. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-JW- Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 Who cares really?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hucknall Ram Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 Considering Burton released him, I'd doubt they'd want him back. Will probably go to the UniBond League.as long he doesn't end up back at hucknall I don't care Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boycie Posted March 17, 2012 Share Posted March 17, 2012 good back up, I think we'll resign him. 'http://www.dcfcfans.co.uk/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/rolleyes' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':rolleyes:' /> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pearl Ram Posted March 17, 2012 Share Posted March 17, 2012 He was a good shot stopper but anything else he was avergae He was a good shot stopper but anything else he was avergae This phrase always puzzles me, isn't being a good shot stopper a pre requisite of being a goalkeeper at league level ? You wouldn't say of a plumber "He fits a good tap" 'http://www.dcfcfans.co.uk/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/blink' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':blink:' /> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G STAR RAM Posted March 17, 2012 Share Posted March 17, 2012 This phrase always puzzles me, isn't being a good shot stopper a pre requisite of being a goalkeeper at league level ? You wouldn't say of a plumber "He fits a good tap" 'http://www.dcfcfans.co.uk/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/blink' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':blink:' /> Or like praising your defenders for kicking it and heading it, wait a minute.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hucknall Ram Posted March 17, 2012 Share Posted March 17, 2012 I do believe he likes his "drink" so might be still in the pub Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leedsram Posted March 17, 2012 Share Posted March 17, 2012 But given the number of goalkeepers we have on contract (with Matt Morch to join as a pro for next season), why didnt' he just get paid off early like so many others. Why are we still paying him ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CornwallRam Posted March 17, 2012 Share Posted March 17, 2012 But given the number of goalkeepers we have on contract (with Matt Morch to join as a pro for next season), why didnt' he just get paid off early like so many others. Why are we still paying him ? I read somewhere that contractually clubs had to fund the medical treatment of injured players until the end of, and in certain circumastances beyond, the end of a players original contract, even if that contract is terminated. So we would have to pay Deeney's medical bill anyway. As he's injured he wouldn't get another club, so there's no way he'd accept a pay off of anything less than his contract - so there is no financial advantage of releasing him early. It is also possible that the club has some sort of deal or insurance where the medical bills of players are either cheaper than the full comercial private rate or covered in a 'block booking' type of arrangement. If Deeney was no longer a Derby player, but the club were responsible for his medical bills, it could end up costing the club even more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GboroRam Posted March 17, 2012 Share Posted March 17, 2012 But given the number of goalkeepers we have on contract (with Matt Morch to join as a pro for next season), why didnt' he just get paid off early like so many others. Why are we still paying him ? Does it matter if we keep him on the books or pay him off? He still collects his wages either way. Commercially I guess paying him off is worse than leaving him to end his contract naturally, as the costs would presumably be reflected in one years' accounts whereas a contract that runs past one year may be spread over 2 or more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sage Posted March 17, 2012 Share Posted March 17, 2012 Does it matter if we keep him on the books or pay him off? He still collects his wages either way. He is on far lower wages. NC will assess the variables re Fielding and Ledzins staying and Deeney's injury before deciding. It's likely he will go IMO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GboroRam Posted March 17, 2012 Share Posted March 17, 2012 He is on far lower wages. NC will assess the variables re Fielding and Ledzins staying and Deeney's injury before deciding. It's likely he will go IMO I was referring to the "why are we still paying him" part - if we pay him off, we've still paid him. Just all in one year's accounts instead of across his contracted term. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.