GboroRam Posted August 7, 2011 Share Posted August 7, 2011 it's not sic, it's sic. Bloody hell, it's a good job someone around here knows their latin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex W Posted August 7, 2011 Share Posted August 7, 2011 it's not sic, it's sic. Bloody hell, it's a good job someone around here knows their latin. Fac ut vivas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
p.shilton Posted August 7, 2011 Share Posted August 7, 2011 it's not sic, it's sic. Bloody hell, it's a good job someone around here knows their latin. Not necessary to italicise any more mate as it is has been adopted as an English word. It's the same as italicising "kiosk":rolleyes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rynny Posted August 7, 2011 Share Posted August 7, 2011 it's not sic, it's sic. Bloody hell, it's a good job someone around here knows their latin. using my phone and can't use any of the buttons above the reply:rolleyes::eek: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ESR Posted August 7, 2011 Share Posted August 7, 2011 a player like stevie howard/ steve howard would been wonderful for us today cuz we were lacking a player to hold up the ball and bring davis bryson the other davis and baily into play i dont think ward can do that cuz he is more of an attacking mid To me Ward is a striker, he reminds me of Tommy Smith but if he played alongside someone like Howard then he would benefit from him like Pesch did alongside Rasiak Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pudding Jack Posted August 7, 2011 Share Posted August 7, 2011 To me Ward is a striker, he reminds me of Tommy Smith but if he played alongside someone like Howard then he would benefit from him like Pesch did alongside Rasiak wheres rasiak now? why couldnt we get him back? i must be younger than howard and has fÜ%kall games behind him sinse he left us for spurs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smalley Ram Posted August 7, 2011 Share Posted August 7, 2011 Did Rasiak go to Spurs? Was trying to think the other day where the key players of that team went and couldn't come up with much - God I was bored, crap meeting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smalley Ram Posted August 7, 2011 Share Posted August 7, 2011 Was told a strong rumour on Saturday by a mate that we're signing Waghorne and Howard on Monday. Can't see it myself but thought i'd mention it, no evidence no sources so could well be ****** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
p.shilton Posted August 7, 2011 Share Posted August 7, 2011 wheres rasiak now? why couldnt we get him back? i must be younger than howard and has fÜ%kall games behind him sinse he left us for spurs Rasiak is fighting for a contract at Charlton- Yes, Fighting.....for a contract at....Charlton! What the hell is going on, surely he is better than that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
p.shilton Posted August 7, 2011 Share Posted August 7, 2011 Was told a strong rumour on Saturday by a mate that we're signing Waghorne and Howard on Monday. Can't see it myself but thought i'd mention it, no evidence no sources so could well be ****** Probably so- Who knows, I would be happy with either or both. Judging by what nige has said about shipping a few out it seems unlikely unless there is something imminent there too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GboroRam Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 By my contacts, it's a stronger likelihood that you should still italicise "sic", regardless. My source is Lynne Truss, never failed me so far. Everything else is just supposition. Might be assumption, could be presumption. I'm undecided. sic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boycie Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 yurra [sic] fecker u are. I can't understand any of the last post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smalley Ram Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 Puteus si vos operor non agnosco tunc vos exertus congelo procul schola Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boycie Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 Qui. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smalley Ram Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 lustus dictus dictus utor interdum Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smalley Ram Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 I think you meant "quis" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boycie Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 duo biere por'favour Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smalley Ram Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 quod nonnullus peanuts praecessi per ut? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boycie Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 Thausus speckius ****** lurcio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex W Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 Parva leves capiunt animas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.