Duracell Posted July 18, 2011 Share Posted July 18, 2011 Anyone know if they're still doing refunds? They are, and you know they are. We get it, you're a miserable git Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
curb Posted July 18, 2011 Share Posted July 18, 2011 They are, and you know they are. We get it, you're a miserable git Robson in! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alph Posted July 18, 2011 Share Posted July 18, 2011 Shackell? Doesn't count. Refund! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RotherhamRam Posted July 18, 2011 Share Posted July 18, 2011 Still no Barker type fees spent. I mean it, i'll walk, i will. Propa. Shackell £1million isn't that what we paid for Barker??:confused: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boycie Posted July 18, 2011 Share Posted July 18, 2011 Shackell £1million isn't that what we paid for Barker??:confused: Don't you start! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RotherhamRam Posted July 18, 2011 Share Posted July 18, 2011 Don't you start! Lol we could add Maguire, Bryson and Fielding fees together and say we paid for 2 and got one free for a Barker type fee. Just puzzeled with something though as it quote at beginning a lot of players we have signed apparently were free. Fielding involved fee. Shackell aka as Barker type fee Maguire compensation so therefore a fee Bryson a fee Ward a fee Robinson a fee (although a packet of crisps, taxi fair and a cup of tea (nominal fee)) Tyson is actually the only free signing. Now I watched the Burton game on media player and really hope that Bryson is fit soon because he looks like he could be a very influential player and he played the holding role. He is quick and always looks for space could he be the next Charlie Adams and this time we bagged him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alph Posted July 18, 2011 Share Posted July 18, 2011 Rotherham out. Forest fan anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RotherhamRam Posted July 18, 2011 Share Posted July 18, 2011 Rotherham out. Forest fan anyway. Now now don't get personal call me wankar, shithead, knobjockey anything but PLEASE PLEASE don't insult me by calling me a Forest Fan. Would rather **** razor blades then be a forest fan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Day Posted July 18, 2011 Share Posted July 18, 2011 I love free transfers. Just thought I'd put my feelings out there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Day Posted July 18, 2011 Share Posted July 18, 2011 Now now don't get personal call me ******, shithead, knobjockey anything but PLEASE PLEASE don't insult me by calling me a Forest Fan. I would rather **** razor blades then support the broccolu;) Anyone got a discorger? think this ones gone right down Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcfcdavecov Posted July 19, 2011 Share Posted July 19, 2011 Jessie J can answer this one...... It's not about the money, money, money, We don't need your money, money, money. We just wanna see The Rams win, Forget about the price tag. Ain't about the (ha!) cha-ching cha-ching. Ain't about the (yeah!) ba-bling ba-bling, Wanna see The Rams win, Forget about the price tag. Or if you drink a few pints of coffee and read this 45 page whopper of a thread your question has be asked, answered, argued, facts, figures, rubbished. The thread almost ended although it was rattled back into life again and your question was answered, argued, facts, figures, rubbished...... http://dcfcfans.co.uk/showthread.php?t=6942 The only bit rubbished is that we have spent millions. That's what you meant, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davenportram Posted July 19, 2011 Share Posted July 19, 2011 The only bit rubbished is that we have spent millions. That's what you meant, right? Think you mean invested millions. We have spent it, but it may not have been from extra investment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcfcdavecov Posted July 19, 2011 Share Posted July 19, 2011 Think you mean invested millions. We have spent it, but it may not have been from extra investment. Same thing. Spend 20p on sweets, but my mate gives me 10p, i've only spent 10p. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duncanjwitham Posted July 19, 2011 Share Posted July 19, 2011 Same thing. Spend 20p on sweets, but my mate gives me 10p, i've only spent 10p. But you've still got 20p's worth of sweets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcfcdavecov Posted July 19, 2011 Share Posted July 19, 2011 But you've still got 20p's worth of sweets. Well done. But i haven't, my mate owns half of them. Bit like selling Varney and buying Shackell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duracell Posted July 19, 2011 Share Posted July 19, 2011 Same thing. Spend 20p on sweets, but my mate gives me 10p, i've only spent 10p. No, you've still spent 20p :confused: Where the money has come from is completely different from what you have spent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcfcdavecov Posted July 19, 2011 Share Posted July 19, 2011 No, you've still spent 20p :confused: Where the money has come from is completely different from what you have spent. No it's not. Net spend is the same. I still have 10p. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcfcdavecov Posted July 19, 2011 Share Posted July 19, 2011 But all this isn't really the point....again. I'm out. Whatever anybody chooses to believe is up to them, but i believe that our net spend is less than a million this season. Plus a 6 million saving in wages. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramjam Posted July 19, 2011 Share Posted July 19, 2011 Well done. But i haven't, my mate owns half of them. Bit like selling Varney and buying Shackell. No matter, the money has been spent and we've got a £1m defender. I think it is fairly well known that the ~£3m spent so far (and indeed the ~£1.5 spent on transfer fees during the previous two seasons) is pretty much covered by income from sales and re-organizing the budget. That is not to say other money hasnt been invested to manage debt/running of the club...I'm not an expert on the finances. But, we still have some players to acquire so lets see what's spent there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duracell Posted July 19, 2011 Share Posted July 19, 2011 No it's not. Net spend is the same. I still have 10p. You have 10p, yes, but you gave the shopkeeper 20p. If you gave the shopkeeper 20p, you have given the shopkeeper 20p. He won't say you've given him 10p. The point being, the board said they'd invest, and they have invested. Where the money has come from is an entirely different matter and I don't recall them saying anything about that. If you spend x, you have spent x. Even if you don't have x amount of money, you've still spent x. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.