Guest Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 Wallington v grant : grant Sage v christie : draw Forsyth v forsyth ; draw Williams v thorne : thorne Hindmarch v buxton : draw Blades v keogh : draw Micklewhite v russell : micklewhite Davison v martin : davison just Gee v bryson : bryson Gregory v hughes : draw Callaghan v dawkins : callaghan Pretty good 3-3 Hoult v grant : grant Carsley v christie : christie as a full back Powell v forsyth : powell Rowett v thorne : thorne Yates v buxton : yates Stimac v keogh : stimac Van der laan v hughes : hughes Powell v dawkins : draw Willems v bryson : bryson Sturridge v russell : sturridge Ward v martin : martin Even better 6-4 Green v grant : green Webster v Christie : webster Robson v forsyth : robson Durban v thorne : durban Mcfarland v keogh : mcfarland Mackay v buxton : mackay Mcgovern v hughes : draw Carlin v bryson : carlin O'hare v martin : o'hare Hector v russell : hector Hinton v dawkins : hinton Oh well 0-10 they were a bit special. Your thoughts ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCFC_17 Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 would it be 11-0 for the 06/07 season? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RamNut Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 would it be 11-0 for the 06/07 season? Good point.....i forgot them. Bywater v grant : grant Mears v christie : draw Mceverley v forsyth : forsyth Johnson v thorne : thorne Moore v buxton : draw just Leacock v keogh : keogh Fagan v hughes : hughes Peschisolido v russell : russell Howard v martin : draw Oakley v bryson : bryson Pearson v dawkins : draw 7-0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srg Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 Pearson vs. Dawks a draw? Howard vs. Martin a draw? Come off it. Pearson was gash and Howard was just a lump. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
North_Stand_Ram Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 Good point.....i forgot them. Bywater v grant : grant Mears v christie : draw Mceverley v forsyth : forsyth Johnson v thorne : thorne Moore v Buxton : draw just Leacock v keogh : keogh Fagan v hughes : hughes Peschisolido v russell : russell Howard v martin : draw Oakley v bryson : bryson Pearson v dawkins : draw 7-0 I agree with you completely minus Leacock. Absolutely outstanding when we went up. Just seemed to lose it when we came down. It does make you wonder how we did so well with that team tho!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RamNut Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 Pearson vs. Dawks a draw? Howard vs. Martin a draw? Come off it. Pearson was gash and Howard was just a lump. Howard was very good. and Pearson was excellent that season - never stopped running. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCFC_17 Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 pearson had a chance in the playoff final and scored, dawkins had a chance and missed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leicester Ram Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 Martin can and will make the step up to the PL, Howard never did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srg Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 and that's your judgment on a player? Pears had no discernible ability other than running, hence his demise into anonymity. Howard, yes he was good, but he couldn't score 25 goals for love nor money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RamNut Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 and that's your judgment on a player? Pears had no discernible ability other than running, hence his demise into anonymity. Howard, yes he was good, but he couldn't score 25 goals for love nor money. He hit the post about a dozen times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tombo Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 pearson had a chance in the playoff final and scored, dawkins had a chance and missed That means ***** all. Even though I think Pearson was better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramsbottom Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 Good point.....i forgot them. Bywater v grant : grant Mears v christie : draw Mceverley v forsyth : forsyth Johnson v thorne : thorne Moore v Buxton : draw just Leacock v keogh : keogh Fagan v hughes : hughes Peschisolido v russell : russell Howard v martin : martin Oakley v bryson : bryson Pearson v dawkins : Dawkins 7-0 9-0 in my opinion, the only reason Bucko & Big Dave are a draw is because I ouldn't want to annoy either of them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramsbottom Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 I agree with you completely minus Leacock. Absolutely outstanding when we went up. Just seemed to lose it when we came down. It does make you wonder how we did so well with that team tho!! If you think that team was dodgy look at the line up on this...http://youtu.be/L-qMAP3JnmM Found it whilst watching Thorne highlights, that side makes for very depressing reading... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramsbottom Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 I agree with you completely minus Leacock. Absolutely outstanding when we went up. Just seemed to lose it when we came down. It does make you wonder how we did so well with that team tho!! If you think that team was dodgy look at the line up on this...http://youtu.be/L-qMAP3JnmM Found it whilst watching Thorne highlights, that side makes for very depressing reading... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramsbottom Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 Apologies for double post... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramsbottom Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 Apologies for double post... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robglosta Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 Billy vs. Mac? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albert Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 Howard was very good.and Pearson was excellent that season - never stopped running.He was damn good, but not Martin good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 Howard scored goals in a side that was a defensive minded unit, Martin scored goals in a team set out to attack, to compare the two stats is unjustified. Martin has had a few years under his belt now, and be it injury or form, he hasn't consistently been a prolific goalscorer or regular for a while now. I think a draw is a fair assessment at present, with hopefully martin repeating his goal scoring and general play this season to edge ahead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smyth_18 Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 Difficult to compare when this team haven't been promoted yet. Could easily be better than the best promotion winning team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.