-
Posts
44 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by BarbadosRam
-
-
3 minutes ago, MuespachRam said:
by the way, isnt Shinnies hair a thing of beauty....so thick, lucious, full bodied and well groomed....he looks just like those photos that were in Ivans Barbers at Ripley in the 70's and 80's...
Haha! Always found it odd that a big Norwich fan ran a barbers in Ripley!
-
-
1 hour ago, Carl Sagan said:
Max Lowe has signed for them and is available for selection for this game.
If he plays the crowd has got to be merciless in terms of "Derby reject" and boos. It's our job to knock him out of his stride, make him not want the ball or be worried every time it goes in his direction.
Shame Festy’s not quite fit. Would have had Lowe on toast!
- Chester40 and Carl Sagan
- 1
- 1
-
-
EFL Twitter confirming accounts filed and now under review. About as much as we were expecting I guess…
-
Just utterly embarrassing
-
Awful from Sibley there. Diving to give away the free kick
-
Wizzy’s last kick winner at Wycombe is the goal that actually kept us up. How random after all that
-
Was Fozzy not playing him on?
- MickD and David Graham Brown
- 2
-
13 hours ago, ramit said:
He was offered a new contract, he refused that offer and was then sacked. Granted, the offer was made in spite of his gross misconduct, but because he refused it, that became the reason he was sacked.
I think the point is (my view of it ) is that if he had accepted the reduced wages it would have been under a completely new contract i.e. he still would have had his original contract terminated (been sacked) but reemployed on a new contract with reduced wages. Basically the club still finding him guilty of gross misconduct but accepting they want him to remain employed with the club, albeit his worth to them is much much less.
-
15 minutes ago, Rolleston said:
Cocu clearly dosn't know what he is managing, or he would never have allowed a team bonding session that was destined to get out of hand. He has to take some of the blame for this
Keep digging fella...
-
19 minutes ago, caymanram said:
The offer of a reduced wage prior to the sacking seriously undermines the Club’s legal position and case with this...
I'm pretty sure the reduced wages offer would have been made "Without Prejudice" i.e. cannot be used against them in any subsequent legal action. At least I hope it was for Mel's sake....
-
Derby County Administration (with the slight possibility of Liquidation still there)
in Derby County Forum
Posted
Agreed. Literally no one in this photo is still part of the club.