ariotofmyown

Do two negatives make a plus?

Wonder if loads of Reading fans are spouting nonsense about how the EFL have told Refs to give decisions against them because THAT IS FOOTBALL IS RUN! Bet Sky hate them too.

Huge win, sets up Saturday for a massive day.

She had "help me" in tiny writing by her wrist, but it was photoshopped out.

That is like when you called me for the one and only time whilst I was adding herbs into my homemade stuffing.

Love that! Probably another thread, but wonder what is the oldest match anyone on here went too. Your first game was 72 years ago, so perhaps there someone who started going before 1952?

Yes, unless you want to become the owner. Then you are fine.

Jonathan Wilson is brilliant. Heard him talk a bit about book and sounds really interesting.

Ah, it didn't show me that one, or I didn't see it. Would it still take about 4 hours too. Plus probably won't run on a bank holiday.

This is obviously a nightmare for people planning an Easter trip to the South Coast. It also means a day off work for people travelling down, then getting home ridiculously early too. But in terms of the trains, was anyone actually planning to travel to Portsmouth and back by train on Easter Monday. The chances of that working properly are very slim. It's also a 4 hour each way journey, going through London on the tube, and £128 return. The drive is 3 hours each way, and door to door too, rather than having to get to stations.

I'm not sure if I want Forest to go down this year, it's pretty good fun seeing this sort of embarrassing action. The promoted teams will be much better next season too, so Forest could have a dismal season and go down demoralised, rather than been fired up by a points deduction. Their owner will hopefully be banned from the ground now as if he was a fan. I've sold all my shares in Tierny's Bakery.

That is great! I was thinking of the smarmy mob lawyer, who knows exactly what he's doing but pretends he is rightly upholding the law.

We all know Clowes is only interested in box ticking. The only reason he saved the club from destruction was to get those boxes ticked. In other news, your post seems to about 100% incorrect.

I'm pretty astounded that they didn't come straight to you and ask you to do the job. Actually, they are probably better off getting you in at a higher level to oversee everything.

Try reading this thread before posting.

You could be there to act a warning against fans having too much say in how the club is run, perhaps with a weekly column in the programme where you talk tactics and formations.

Not sure you have quite grapsed what the role entails.

This is an example of why you don't get invited to parties: EraniosSocks: "That new Noel Gallagher and Jon Squire song is rubbish. Noel's singing is terrible on it." Guest: "It's actually Liam Gallager, not Noel." ES: "Ok, John Peel"

Come on Gayle!!!!

(Don't) beware the ides of March.

Agree with most of that, but the same issues with the way we play are there with 2 cbs and 2 full backs too. We also have Forsyth and Nyambe injured, who are our best 2 proper fullbacks. I think a back 3, with Adams in front, could be a great "back 4". If we keep our wing backs high, this feels like it could be an attacking lineup.

If only it had the hallmark of the crowd getting involved if we did concede and getting really behind the team? I'm not sure if the crowd are so sensitive to turn toxic with us 2nd in the league. Don't judge the home crowd by a small set of toxic posters on here.

You say the same garbage every week. We don't usually lose, so you are usually wrong.

Do you so know little about football that if someone points out that Sibley is not a full back, and hence we are not playing with 5 at the back, that you post a sarcastic response that the poster thinks of themselves as some sort of tactical genius. In the same way that posters continually moan about Warne's press conference, there are also people who think 3 cbs equals a highly defensive 5 at the back. As was mentiond earlier in this thread, thess debates are so tiresome and moronic. Good debates are around the style of play, which system suits our players the best, do we have the right players, is the manager improving the players etc. "Why does Warne say the opposition are good" and "why are playing 5 across the back vs this team" is just really boring. Have we ever played 5 at the back this season? We have either played 2 cbs and 2 full backs, or we play 3 cbs with 2 high wing backs.

I usually listen to non-fiction on Audible, but got Circe to listen too as ended up with a few credits to burn. I'll try and get round to listening to it sooner than planned now! Thanks.