DcFc Dyycheee Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 No point paying the FA money to register a player that won't play for the season. True, but I just wouldn't of registered the number 5 with anyone... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
networker1884 Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 Looks like no number for Barker http://www.dcfc.co.uk/javaImages/8a/67/0,,10270~11036554,00 Sexy Beast Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davenportram Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 ah yeah, looks like him, although it could easily be no.27, 37 etc. The one begins Brayford is 17, the other number 7 looks like its just number 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McRamFan Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 True, but I just wouldn't of registered the number 5 with anyone... Why not? Its just a number. Last season we had no No 8 and it got silly at transfer times as to who would be brought in to fill it. Using No 5 this season clearly states that Barks will have no part this campaign, as leaving it blank could encourage some to think he would be back sooner. Also if Bucko has it, could be inspirational. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DcFc Dyycheee Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 Why not? Its just a number. Last season we had no No 8 and it got silly at transfer times as to who would be brought in to fill it. Using No 5 this season clearly states that Barks will have no part this campaign, as leaving it blank could encourage some to think he would be back sooner. Also if Bucko has it, could be inspirational. Okay, I agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-JW- Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 All pics here [url=http://www.dcfc.co.uk/page/Gallery/0,,10270~2844141,00.html]http://www.dcfc.co.uk/page/Gallery/0,,10270~2844141,00.html Hendrick 8 Buxton 5 Jacobs 12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McRamFan Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 Do you think that under the sponsors name and in brackets they should print (...just not on O2!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 The one begins Brayford is 17, the other number 7 looks like its just number 7 I doubt Galanski would be 7 though? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stedcfc Posted July 12, 2012 Author Share Posted July 12, 2012 Theo's go 11, Galkinski has 27 and Steve Davies has no number Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RhodesTheRam Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 I presume these are all training numbers and not actual squad numbers like last year, OB, Hendrick and Bally had numbers in the 40's so it could all change. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trekkie_ram Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 I presume these are all training numbers and not actual squad numbers like last year, OB, Hendrick and Bally had numbers in the 40's so it could all change. Except they all seem plausible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-JW- Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 I presume these are all training numbers and not actual squad numbers like last year, OB, Hendrick and Bally had numbers in the 40's so it could all change. They weren't expected to play much at all last season, hence the higher numbers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
randombc Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 Something like this- Fielding - 1 Brayford - 2 Roberts - 3 Bryson - 4 Buxton - 5 Bryson - 8 Tyson - 9 Ward - 10 Robinson - 11 Jacobs - 12 Legzdins - 13 Doyle - 14 O'Brien - 15 Ball - 16 Naylor - 17 Hughes - 19 Bennett - 20 Galinski - 27 Richards - 28 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RhodesTheRam Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 Something like this- Fielding - 1 Brayford - 2 Roberts - 3 Bryson - 4 Buxton - 5 Bryson - 8 Tyson - 9 Ward - 10 Robinson - 11 Jacobs - 12 Legzdins - 13 Doyle - 14 O'Brien - 15 Ball - 16 Naylor - 17 Hughes - 19 Bennett - 20 Galinski - 27 Richards - 28 Ben Davies 18 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RhodesTheRam Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 They weren't expected to play much at all last season, hence the higher numbers. Yeah i was just stating these aren't the final numbers, just the fact that the training numbers aren't always the same as the actual squad numbers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belper Posted July 13, 2012 Share Posted July 13, 2012 barker is 5b Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackNwhites Posted July 13, 2012 Share Posted July 13, 2012 barker is 5b He's SB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belper Posted July 13, 2012 Share Posted July 13, 2012 He's SB. they have made the 5 look like an s http://a6.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/391523_10151093474485797_1072780964_n Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
randombc Posted July 13, 2012 Share Posted July 13, 2012 It's SB for Shaun Barker. Genius Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duracell Posted July 14, 2012 Share Posted July 14, 2012 Guys these probably aren't actual squad numbers just like every other first training session of the season, they just stuck vaguely realistic squad numbers on training kits, probably not thinking that people will be decoding these numbers on the internet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.