OoooMarkWright Posted yesterday at 09:52 Share Posted yesterday at 09:52 26 minutes ago, Malagaram said: Slightly bumped,he was bloody knocked over! The keeper wasn't knocked over at all. As the corner is taken Silva is in front of Sa, Sa then pushes him out the way, Silva then moves out of the keepers vision as Stones heads the ball. It was the correct decision. Rammy03 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ram-Alf Posted yesterday at 09:54 Share Posted yesterday at 09:54 9 hours ago, Will the Ram said: Jose Sa was clearly fouled seconds before stones scores. I also don’t understand how Southampton didn’t get a penalty for the shirt pull yet Leicester got one that was just as blatant. Spot on Will...beggars belief, Taylor the ref said summat like "it was inconsequential" as he saw it at the time 😡 Malagaram 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premier ram Posted yesterday at 10:24 Share Posted yesterday at 10:24 Come on Palace Ram-Alf 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bris Vegas Posted 22 hours ago Share Posted 22 hours ago 4 hours ago, Malagaram said: Slightly bumped,he was bloody knocked over! I understand there is a bit of a union going on, whether that is to support the smaller clubs, feel there is a huge leniency toward City or a general dislike of VAR, and all could be justified, but there really wasn’t a foul there. Sa wasn’t bumped to the floor. He was slightly nudged while Foden was taking the corner, and he actually pushes Silva away before Stones even touches the ball. You can see even before Stones touches the ball how far away Silva is. You can’t be giving free kicks for bumps in the penalty area. Grabbing is different, but all the players bumped. In the shot, the Wolves player 20 Is trying to push Stones, they were never going to penalise that either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malagaram Posted 22 hours ago Share Posted 22 hours ago 5 hours ago, OoooMarkWright said: The keeper wasn't knocked over at all. As the corner is taken Silva is in front of Sa, Sa then pushes him out the way, Silva then moves out of the keepers vision as Stones heads the ball. It was the correct decision. Should,ave gone to Specsavers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ram-Alf Posted 21 hours ago Share Posted 21 hours ago 1 hour ago, Bris Vegas said: I understand there is a bit of a union going on, whether that is to support the smaller clubs, feel there is a huge leniency toward City or a general dislike of VAR, and all could be justified, but there really wasn’t a foul there. Sa wasn’t bumped to the floor. He was slightly nudged while Foden was taking the corner, and he actually pushes Silva away before Stones even touches the ball. You can see even before Stones touches the ball how far away Silva is. You can’t be giving free kicks for bumps in the penalty area. Grabbing is different, but all the players bumped. In the shot, the Wolves player 20 Is trying to push Stones, they were never going to penalise that either. PS...by the looks of that picture Bris the keeper was knocked into the stands...where the feck is he? have you airbrushed him out? 😉 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bris Vegas Posted 20 hours ago Share Posted 20 hours ago (edited) 1 hour ago, Ram-Alf said: PS...by the looks of that picture Bris the keeper was knocked into the stands...where the feck is he? have you airbrushed him out? 😉 It’s pretty amazing how he is completely covered by Stones and the defender. Can’t even see his feet. Edited 20 hours ago by Bris Vegas Malagaram and Ram-Alf 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grumpy Git Posted 19 hours ago Share Posted 19 hours ago (edited) The 'big' teams get the breaks end of story. How many bad decisions did we have go against us in that season? Yes, we were crap, but that doesn't excuse playing against 12 men every week, (even if the ref isn't aware he's being biassed). It's like when a kid is accused of doing something wrong where an adult has said they're guilty, no matter if the little'un is totally innocent, the adult will get the benefit of the doubt 99% of the time. Edited 19 hours ago by Grumpy Git Malagaram 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account.
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now