Srg Posted January 6, 2016 Share Posted January 6, 2016 Added pace to stretch teams and create more space for Martin and allow Ince to play in the middle if needed. No one is replacing anyone, just options. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Van der MoodHoover Posted January 7, 2016 Share Posted January 7, 2016 15 hours ago, cheron85 said: I would suggest only in as much as signing Johnson and Butterfield was because we don't think Hendrick is good enough and we never think Hughes is ever coming back... Think in this day it's important to have plenty of cover... And if that cover happens to be as good as the starters then great! The rotation we've seen on who is 'first choice' in our wingers shows form will be the main decider of who plays... And it's worried the hell out of me recently when we've only had Bent and Weimann as potential 'game changing' subs... By all accounts subbing Weimann on at boro was certainly game changing. Not necessarily to our advantage tho. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cheron85 Posted January 8, 2016 Share Posted January 8, 2016 On 1/7/2016 at 06:47, HantsRam said: By all accounts subbing Weimann on at boro was certainly game changing. Not necessarily to our advantage tho. Not sure what your point is here tbh? Are you blaming Weimann for the defeat? Or are you just having a general moan? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Van der MoodHoover Posted January 8, 2016 Share Posted January 8, 2016 3 hours ago, cheron85 said: Not sure what your point is here tbh? Are you blaming Weimann for the defeat? Or are you just having a general moan? I wasn't there so am merely reflecting other views on here that the substitution of Weimann for Butterfield lost us the midfield and hence altered the balance of the game in Boro's favour. Materially altering the course of a game not going our way is something I think Paul Clement is still learning. I am struggling to recall a game which was successfully turned around by a substitute or tactical change. I don't think that's a general moan. More a specific observation/criticism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rynny Posted January 8, 2016 Share Posted January 8, 2016 1 minute ago, HantsRam said: I wasn't there so am merely reflecting other views on here that the substitution of Weimann for Butterfield lost us the midfield and hence altered the balance of the game in Boro's favour. Materially altering the course of a game not going our way is something I think Paul Clement is still learning. I am struggling to recall a game which was successfully turned around by a substitute or tactical change. I don't think that's a general moan. More a specific observation/criticism. MK Dons, bringing Bent on and moving Ince centrally Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Van der MoodHoover Posted January 8, 2016 Share Posted January 8, 2016 3 minutes ago, rynny said: MK Dons, bringing Bent on and moving Ince centrally And I was there....... I blame the apres-ski vin chaud ☺ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zag zig Posted January 8, 2016 Share Posted January 8, 2016 1 minute ago, HantsRam said: And I was there....... I blame the apres-ski vin chaud ☺ Was you drinking that when Ince came on at Leeds and scored with his first touch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Van der MoodHoover Posted January 8, 2016 Share Posted January 8, 2016 6 minutes ago, Zag zig said: Was you drinking that when Ince came on at Leeds and scored with his first touch That would have been the Christmas port with the folks on their annual visit ?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.