Leeds Ram Posted June 20, 2011 Share Posted June 20, 2011 Well it would take a lot for a single player, the most we have paid in the championship for a single player thus far was 900k for barker so why would they spend 2 million on one? it isn't going to happen and there are better clubs who would want him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davenportram Posted June 20, 2011 Share Posted June 20, 2011 Well it would take a lot for a single player, the most we have paid in the championship for a single player thus far was 900k for barker so why would they spend 2 million on one? it isn't going to happen and there are better clubs who would want him. Shakell is over £1m and the reported bid on Waghorn is £1.25m. I agree it would be a massive fee, but earlier in the thread someone has said QPR have bid just £1.2m, so would it really take £2m ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leeds Ram Posted June 20, 2011 Share Posted June 20, 2011 well we haven't signed any of them, i was thinking shackell was on the way but he isn't here yet, maybe maybe not, i was pointing out if it would take 2 million i can't see us spending that amount on a single player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boycie Posted June 20, 2011 Share Posted June 20, 2011 I might let them keep my season ticket money if they sign Ambrose Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boycie Posted June 20, 2011 Share Posted June 20, 2011 I might let them keep my season ticket money if they sign Ambrose Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asanovic Posted June 20, 2011 Share Posted June 20, 2011 I'm still holding out for Michael Owen, or my refund form is being sent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albert Posted June 20, 2011 Share Posted June 20, 2011 Shakell is over £1m and the reported bid on Waghorn is £1.25m. I agree it would be a massive fee, but earlier in the thread someone has said QPR have bid just £1.2m, so would it really take £2m ? Why would they bid that, that's just insulting. They should get their money out and offer that £2 mil like the papers said! That's how it works isn't it?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rodders Posted June 20, 2011 Share Posted June 20, 2011 if hull are in for him, that means we'll sign him, maybe on less money aswell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcfcdavecov Posted June 20, 2011 Share Posted June 20, 2011 Massive fee or not, i think this summer has been planned for along time....we have'nt missed a target yet....the money needed and wage bill will have been worked out to the last peeny...you're mad if you think that another player for around 1 million is coming.....unless a bigger fee is gained for Varney etc than what we were anticipating. (after Shackell and Waghorn) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rodders Posted June 20, 2011 Share Posted June 20, 2011 well we dont need waghorn anymore, due to the amount of strikers we have so the reported 1.2M may go on ambrose ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcfcdavecov Posted June 20, 2011 Share Posted June 20, 2011 well we dont need waghorn anymore, due to the amount of strikers we have so the reported 1.2M may go on ambrose ? Could well do....who knows, it's only guessing, but maybe we didn't expect to get Tyson....he did reportedly turn us down and held talks with Millwall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rodders Posted June 20, 2011 Share Posted June 20, 2011 would love ambrose but not gonna hold my breath over it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcfcdavecov Posted June 20, 2011 Share Posted June 20, 2011 Not if it takes as long as Maguire! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rodders Posted June 20, 2011 Share Posted June 20, 2011 good point or shackell, but that happening tomorrow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albert Posted June 20, 2011 Share Posted June 20, 2011 Don't need Waghorn? What?! While we're at it lets drop the Shackell deal because we've already got some centrehalves! Signing him has nothing to do with signing a striker who will be the goal threat or anything! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcfcdavecov Posted June 20, 2011 Share Posted June 20, 2011 Don't need Waghorn? What?! While we're at it lets drop the Shackell deal because we've already got some centrehalves! Signing him has nothing to do with signing a striker who will be the goal threat or anything! Nice useage of the exclamation mark there. Sarcasm 6/10 C Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albert Posted June 20, 2011 Share Posted June 20, 2011 Nice useage of the exclamation mark there. Sarcasm 6/10 C But... but... I need at least a B to pass this class!!! Surely you can give me a B? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcfcdavecov Posted June 20, 2011 Share Posted June 20, 2011 ohhhh, i wanted a reply about being condascending. Ah well. Thought i would get at least a paragraph back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rodders Posted June 20, 2011 Share Posted June 20, 2011 Don't need Waghorn? What?! While we're at it lets drop the Shackell deal because we've already got some centrehalves! Signing him has nothing to do with signing a striker who will be the goal threat or anything! well last year when we played well we had kuqi, who scored about twice for us but oh well its all about a big name player coming, not like it was the attacking 3 that scored all the goals or anything and its not like ambrose would play this attacking 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boycie Posted June 20, 2011 Share Posted June 20, 2011 Ambrose is a big puddin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.