Butros Posted January 20, 2015 Share Posted January 20, 2015 Wigan rejected the bid! Just going through the motions, it's 95% done deal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RamNut Posted January 20, 2015 Share Posted January 20, 2015 Just going through the motions, it's 95% done deal Stop pinching all our players.... Wisdom, mcmanaman and........er.........whoever else you next sign. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boycie Posted January 20, 2015 Share Posted January 20, 2015 Wigan rejected the bid!the chairman says he's not for sale, and if the chairman says he's not for sale, he's going nowhere. Like Thorne. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Butros Posted January 21, 2015 Share Posted January 21, 2015 Second bid turned down. The fee is not an issue, it's just how the deal is structured. Wigan want more up front, WBA want smaller up front payment then other payments based on certain clauses Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Butros Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 Better late than never. http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/football/31011549 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McRamFan Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 Better late than never.http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/football/31011549 The Wigan chairman maybe a bit of a dinosaur, however he's pretty good at spanking cash out of WBA. You've paided way over for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dimmu Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 Crazy price. Hughes must be worth 40 millions nowadays... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Butros Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 The Wigan chairman maybe a bit of a dinosaur, however he's pretty good at spanking cash out of WBA. You've paided way over for him. Not really, it's not 4.75m up front. Quite a few conditions involved, so if WBA do end up paying the full amount it will only mean he has been a success. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DEL Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 He's worth at least Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Butros Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 As I say, if WBA end up paying the full 4.75m it will be a good deal as it will mean he's been successful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DEL Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 As I say, if WBA end up paying the full 4.75m it will be a good deal as it will mean he's been successful. How so? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McRamFan Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 As I say, if WBA end up paying the full 4.75m it will be a good deal as it will mean he's been successful. No it does not. He could be seen with rose tinted glasses by Pulis and trigger all the appearence clauses and be average. Or if he is successful a big team will buy him and you will get clobbered by a huge sell on clause and make less than you paid... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Butros Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 No it does not. He could be seen with rose tinted glasses by Pulis and trigger all the appearence clauses and be average. Or if he is successful a big team will buy him and you will get clobbered by a huge sell on clause and make less than you paid... More involved than just appearance clause, although sell on clause not one of them. If there was a sell on clause it would be a percentage of anything over the original fee ( which is the standard way of doing it) so no chance of making less than originally paid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boycie Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 He's not George Thorne though is he? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Butros Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 He's not George Thorne though is he? Who? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i-Ram Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 Another flair player for Pulis to keep on the bench. Can't be long before Whelan and Walters arrive. Hoof! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Butros Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 WBA need wide players, Pulis has stated this so hardly likely to sign one and leave him on the bench. Nice try though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McRamFan Posted January 29, 2015 Share Posted January 29, 2015 WBA need wide players, Pulis has stated this so hardly likely to sign one and leave him on the bench. Nice try though So he has them to pick the ball out of the stands? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Butros Posted January 29, 2015 Share Posted January 29, 2015 Keep trying, you might get a laugh eventually Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McRamFan Posted January 29, 2015 Share Posted January 29, 2015 Keep trying, you might get a laugh eventually We are laughing, laughing at WBA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.