Ambitious Posted July 1, 2014 Share Posted July 1, 2014 It's easy to be ITK if you know the right people, it's only when conflicting news stories come out do you look daft - which seems to be happening a lot at the minute. Here's my ITK... There will be a third bid for Thorne this week. There has been bids for Francis, but we're not interested anymore. We've pulled out of the Juke race for Boro to show their hand, 'one to watch' Actively seeking a good right back, but willing to wait until towards the end of July in order to get a view on Wisdom. We've not bid for McClean. Ross McCormack will NOT be a Derby player next season. We will be releasing more contract news within the next week or so. Bryson won't be here next season. So, if we hear news about Thorne before next tuesdays, I am ITK. if we hear nothing more on Francis, I'm ITK. If Boro accept a fee for Juke, within Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
North_Stand_Ram Posted July 1, 2014 Share Posted July 1, 2014 @WBrettWilson: @StefanBroome we are showing the love to @GeorgeThorne15 and @bryso7 - time will tell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
North_Stand_Ram Posted July 1, 2014 Share Posted July 1, 2014 He's not really helping though unless he's got some info that the bookies are taking bets on. They never do. They're just trying to be the centre of attention, and it's clearly working, hence why so many are having a go at this ITK stuff. But he's never got anything wrong. You probably haven't followed his news but he called the Wisdom, Forsyth (which day), Whitbread and more signings. He's also today said we're tying to signing a player from Bristol rovers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
climbon Posted July 1, 2014 Share Posted July 1, 2014 @WBrettWilson: @StefanBroome we are showing the love to @GeorgeThorne15 and @bryso7 - time will tell. Hmm...showing the love to Thorne...has a bid been accepted?? Contract talks?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jenkinson Posted July 1, 2014 Author Share Posted July 1, 2014 Some bullshit from Suzie (Burnley FC reporter): BURNLEY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PistoldPete2 Posted July 1, 2014 Share Posted July 1, 2014 Some bullshit from Suzie (Burnley FC reporter): http://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/sport/11310975._/? If that clause really existed, there would be a whole host of clubs after him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cisse Posted July 1, 2014 Share Posted July 1, 2014 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duncanjwitham Posted July 1, 2014 Share Posted July 1, 2014 If (and it's a big if) that story is true, then the thing that worries me more than anything is that we don't appear to know what's written in our players contracts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eddie Posted July 1, 2014 Share Posted July 1, 2014 If (and it's a big if) that story is true, then the thing that worries me more than anything is that we don't appear to know what's written in our players contracts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sidiakez Posted July 1, 2014 Share Posted July 1, 2014 Like stated, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Teale Posted July 1, 2014 Share Posted July 1, 2014 If he wouldn't sign without this clause being put in then what else could we do? I'm sure it came from his side and not the clubs. Sadly it shows how much power the player has now. I think its clear this clause is there and we are trying our hardest to get some more money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srg Posted July 1, 2014 Share Posted July 1, 2014 That doesn't make sense. If we had to sell at Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duncanjwitham Posted July 1, 2014 Share Posted July 1, 2014 If he wouldn't sign without this clause being put in then what else could we do? I'm sure it came from his side and not the clubs. Sadly it shows how much power the player has now. I think its clear this clause is there and we are trying our hardest to get some more money. The thing is, the clause is so ridiculously low, it just doesn't make any sense. With a sell on clause to Kilmarnock and whatever we've paid Bryson in wages/bonuses, we're almost guaranteed to make a loss if we ever sold him. If it was demanded by Bryson's side, then he should have been sold last summer. If Bryson genuinely wanted it in there as insurance so he could move to the prem, then there's no need for the clause to be so low. Prem clubs would easily spend Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davenportram Posted July 1, 2014 Share Posted July 1, 2014 Personally I think he had it put in as a bargaining chip for a bumper contract. With two years left would he be discussing an extension at the moment without a release clause? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nookiebear Posted July 1, 2014 Share Posted July 1, 2014 The clause looks like its there but like SRG said if it was deffo for 750k everyone would have stuck a bid in and he could just choose the biggest wages ?? something not quite right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramexpat Posted July 1, 2014 Share Posted July 1, 2014 750k can buy his left boot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChaddesdenRam Posted July 1, 2014 Share Posted July 1, 2014 It's daylight robbery now. However when he signed that contract 750,00 might not have seemed too bad. If he had not signed that contract he may have left prior to this season and then never have had the season he did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaspode Posted July 1, 2014 Share Posted July 1, 2014 750k can buy his left boot I suspect the PFA would have something to say if we tried to chop bits of him off and sell them separately.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
North_Stand_Ram Posted July 1, 2014 Share Posted July 1, 2014 In my opinion, Nixon and Lanc Telegraph have been told the truth. Derby trying to increase their chances in court by adding to the story by making it known that it's not true In local media, making it seem more obvious. I'll all go down to the courts, if he's agreed terms and doesn't want to be here then sell him. My opinion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
top 6 finish Posted July 1, 2014 Share Posted July 1, 2014 The Burnley reporter has probably got most of it about right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.