Jump to content

Toadbelly

Member
  • Posts

    228
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Toadbelly

  1. 9 minutes ago, DCFC1388 said:

    Actually shows a little bit of pace for a couole of goals in the below video...

     

    Would give us a huge threat on set pieces with Bradley as well

    Like a slow motion haaland! Sign him up, speed him up, and get a tail on him….brilliant! 

  2. 1 hour ago, ramit said:

    As a fan who doesn't go to matches i can only give a general opinion, which is that i don't support lifetime banning.  Exclusion does not allow for a person a chance to improve their behavior and so they probably won't and therefor such a policy is detrimental to society.  Throwing people in the bin benefits no one.

    Do they necessarily mean ‘lifetime’? I agree that would seem overly harsh as an automatic punishment, but a one or two year ban seems perfectly reasonable and allows for reform. I also agree with the comments about the behaviour of footballers. Needs sorting. If rugby players can keep their heads (mostly) and be respectful to all, surely footballers can. 

  3. On 17/01/2022 at 15:01, Toadbelly said:

    Could MM perhaps take on the potential financial liability of the spurious Wycombe and Middlesborough lawsuits, thereby removing the main barrier to a purchase? In much the same way as an insurance company takes on such risks. As both cases will undoubtedly fail, this would cost MM considerably less than 7-8Mil but still have the desired effect of saving the club.  

    Hmmmmmm….perhaps MM DOES read these pages ?

  4. Could MM perhaps take on the potential financial liability of the spurious Wycombe and Middlesborough lawsuits, thereby removing the main barrier to a purchase? In much the same way as an insurance company takes on such risks. As both cases will undoubtedly fail, this would cost MM considerably less than 7-8Mil but still have the desired effect of saving the club.  

×
×
  • Create New...