Boycie Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 it would have helped if the ref didnt send our best player off, not only he is skillfull, scores goals, puts in decent crosses, but he tracks back as well tracks back and gives away peno's and gets sent off for it. Hardly the refs fault? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
masoudakbari Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 a yellow and a peno would be enough, brad jones had most of the goal covered, and 10 vs 11 made it unfair IMO. I can name lots of other incidents like this that gets a yellow They might have won anyway, but that decision didnt even give us a fukin chance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davenportram Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 a yellow and a peno would be enough, brad jones had most of the goal covered, and 10 vs 11 made it unfair IMO. I can name lots of other incidents like this that gets a yellow They might have won anyway, but that decision didnt even give us a fukin chance Maybe so, but weren't we all up in arms when Commons was upended at Bristol, and there was another one after that but can't remember who and where, when a yellow was shown and not Red. Seems unfair we didn't get the same result but can't really moan when the red is not shown in our favour, then moan about it when it us shown against us. It just highlights inconsistency and that referees interpretations may differ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boycie Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 a yellow and a peno would be enough, brad jones had most of the goal covered, and 10 vs 11 made it unfair IMO. I can name lots of other incidents like this that gets a yellow They might have won anyway, but that decision didnt even give us a fukin chance last man means last man before facing the goalie. Regardless of where the goalie is. 2 game ban now, back for Reading Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rynny Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 Maybe so, but weren't we all up in arms when Commons was upended at Bristol, and there was another one after that but can't remember who and where, when a yellow was shown and not Red. Seems unfair we didn't get the same result but can't really moan when the red is not shown in our favour, then moan about it when it us shown against us. It just highlights inconsistency and that referees interpretations may differ. Boro away dav, foul on ward for our peno. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davenportram Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 Boro away dav, foul on ward for our peno. Oh yeah, poetic injustice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
masoudakbari Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 boro at home, foul by their keeper on kuqi I moaned about common's one, because we didnt get a peno for that, so therefire it should be a red, but if you do get a penalty, then that should be your reward and it should stay 11 vs 11, especially, when our jones that most of the goal covered Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rynny Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 Oh yeah, poetic injustice As it seems to have been for a while now, it is as though most major decisions go against us, and have for a few seasons now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boycie Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 boro at home, foul by their keeper on kuqi I moaned about common's one, because we didnt get a peno for that, so therefire it should be a red, but if you do get a penalty, then that should be your reward and it should stay 11 vs 11, especially, when our jones that most of the goal covered Please explain to me what that has to do with anything? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
masoudakbari Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 Its not an amazing goal scoring oppertunity, and its another example of the ref understanding the rules and not the game IMO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rynny Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 Its not an amazing goal scoring oppertunity, and its another example of the ref understanding the rules and not the game IMO If a player is 1 on 1 with the keeper, it is a goal scoring opportunity, I would fancy myself to score in any situation along those lines, regardless of where the keeper is, so should any professional player (even a defender) It doesn't have to be an amazing opportunity either, just a scoring 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastKentRam Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 If a player is 1 on 1 with the keeper, it is a goal scoring opportunity, I would fancy myself to score in any situation along those lines, regardless of where the keeper is, so should any professional player (even a defender) It doesn't have to be an amazing opportunity either, just a scoring 1 You must be better in real life than you are on Fifa then mate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rynny Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 You must be better in real life than you are on Fifa then mate Couldn't have been any worse to be fair mate At least I didn't employ the "shoot as soon as I got the ball no matter what" stance, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hucknall Ram Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 Fancy your chances? I ve seen u, u still miss lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rynny Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 Fancy your chances? I ve seen u, u still miss lol. I have scored all my shots in the box 3 in 7 isn't bad from midfield It was Shane that missed the 1 on 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RamNut Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 I'm not having that, we were offered 500k for a player that showed little more than what we paid for him around 200k-300k so to get nearly double what I would of valued him at was good business . Those figures are fictional We paid £300k with another £75k due We received £400k Against Burnley we had four right footed defenders? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sunnyside Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 Ayale MOM! Having a laugh it was his fault they scored there 1st! Barker was with Iwelemo n ayala got attracted to the ball leaving eagles with a simple 1 v 1 with jones! The fluency and form started to return since the return of a fit bailey in midfield! IMO:- jones 6 brayford 7 anderson 6 savage 6 barker 7 ayala 6 bailey 7 robinson 7 ward 7 davies 5 pearson 6 Eagles was mom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.