Isn't this why 3 points for a win was introduced: to encourage attacking play, particularly away from home.
With so many games still to play and form (particularly in the lower leagues) being so variable I'm not overly excited by targets as such, only that we play to win our games and stay in touch (at least) with the top positions.
I was a statistician so am fascinated by the ways Football is analysed to death these days. Stats 101 states that predictions are more likely prove right with more data points. BUT at the individual game level the numbers are so low that any prediction of any characteristic has a very low probability of being correct. Be that goals, throw-ins wins draws.
Ask yourself why betting organisations are helpfully pushing us to use these numbers. It encourages us to believe we can do a better job of weighing the odds than they can, so we play more. Thing is they have masses of data points to set the odds and can happily (from their point of view) lose some because overall they will come out ahead.
Its not quite "snake oil" but probably better than Horace Batchelors Infra draw system for K E N Y S H A M Bristol.