davenportram Posted August 1, 2012 Share Posted August 1, 2012 Sold - Shackell, Maguire. £1.35m undisclosed but from rumours Varney 300k So thats 1.65m income How much have we spent? Jacobs -£500k (I think that was the rumour) Keogh - £750k - £1.2m (based on the most we have paid for player and more than we received for Shackell from RD) Coutts - cant remember the rumour Oconnor undisclosed Quite possibly a net spend and not break even. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asanovic Posted August 1, 2012 Share Posted August 1, 2012 Sold - Shackell, Maguire. £1.35m undisclosed but from rumours Varney 300k So thats 1.65m income How much have we spent? Jacobs -£500k (I think that was the rumour) Keogh - £750k (based on the most we have paid fit a player from RD) Coutts - cant remember the rumour Oconnor undisclosed Quite possibly a net spend and not break even. Shush!!!!! Yanks out, lining their pockets with Shackell money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ambitious Posted August 1, 2012 Share Posted August 1, 2012 Hard to discuss really - haven't heard anything about O'Connor, guessing around 150-200k again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davenportram Posted August 1, 2012 Author Share Posted August 1, 2012 True but if Coutts and Oconnor are a combined £500k then we are in positive spending territory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
randombc Posted August 1, 2012 Share Posted August 1, 2012 Shackell - £1.1 million Varney - £300,000 Addison - £150,000 Maguire - £250,000 = £1.8 million Jacobs £450,000 Keogh £1.1 million Coutts £150,000 O'Connor £200,000? = 1.9 million Slightly positive net spend, but still need to sell Bailey and Savies and buy another striker, so I'd imagine it will stay pretty level Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davenportram Posted August 1, 2012 Author Share Posted August 1, 2012 I forgot Addison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 1, 2012 Share Posted August 1, 2012 So a thread about a positive, break even or a negative net spend, around undisclosed fees that have been based upon rumours to prove what, that actually we havent got a clue what the spend in or out is, and even if we did what the breakdown of the payments are / were ? 'http://www.dcfcfans.co.uk/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/blink' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':blink:' /> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CookieRam Posted August 1, 2012 Share Posted August 1, 2012 We must have got at least a couple of million for Crofty.... 'http://www.dcfcfans.co.uk/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/ph34r' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':ph34r:' /> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davenportram Posted August 1, 2012 Author Share Posted August 1, 2012 We must have got at least a couple of million for Crofty.... 'http://www.dcfcfans.co.uk/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/ph34r' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':ph34r:' /> He's on loan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 1, 2012 Share Posted August 1, 2012 Sure we got an undisclosed fee to for Ball loan didnt we ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davenportram Posted August 1, 2012 Author Share Posted August 1, 2012 So a thread about a positive, break even or a negative net spend, around undisclosed fees that have been based upon rumours to prove what, that actually we havent got a clue what the spend in or out is, and even if we did what the breakdown of the payments are / were ? 'http://www.dcfcfans.co.uk/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/blink' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':blink:' /> Exactly We don't know - but most are happy to believe the £1.1m, 250k and 150k rumours for Shackell, Maguire and Addison when knocking Clough and the board. They should also be happy to believe rumoured undisclosed fees for the incoming players too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 1, 2012 Share Posted August 1, 2012 Exactly We don't know - but most are happy to believe the £1.1m, 250k and 150k rumours for Shackell, Maguire and Addison when knocking Clough and the board. They should also be happy to believe rumoured undisclosed fees for the incoming players too. Fair enough, but you have to include all players to prove your point ie Ball and Addision. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davenportram Posted August 1, 2012 Author Share Posted August 1, 2012 Ball didn't generate income and a poster after me included Addison and took income to £1.8m and outgoings to £1.9m Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CookieRam Posted August 1, 2012 Share Posted August 1, 2012 B*llocks, can't we get rid of him already?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 1, 2012 Share Posted August 1, 2012 So we let Ball go to Coventry for nothing ? I thought he went as part of the deal, which would indicate that the cash involved would have been less as a result of this, otherwise why let him go ? I also couldnt find any details on the O'Connor fee being 200k ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davenportram Posted August 1, 2012 Author Share Posted August 1, 2012 B*llocks, can't we get rid of him already?! We have been trying to get rid of Croft for ages Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davenportram Posted August 1, 2012 Author Share Posted August 1, 2012 So we let Ball go to Coventry for nothing ? I thought he went as part of the deal, which would indicate that the cash involved would have been less as a result of this, otherwise why let him go ? I also couldnt find any details on the O'Connor fee being 200k ? Ball going on loan won't have generated any in income it may have been sweetener on top of the fee paid for Keogh and wouldn't have reduced the reported fee. If you notice the poster put question marks on the Oconnor fee. However how likely is it that a player who is still under contract and a first tean squad member costs less than £200k?. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jagerbob Posted August 1, 2012 Share Posted August 1, 2012 If the wages handed out are less then before then the board wont care how much we spend on transfer fees. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 1, 2012 Share Posted August 1, 2012 [url=http://www.coventryobserver.co.uk/2012/07/25/sport-Young-striker-Callum-Ball-signs-for-Sky-Blues-on-loan-45931.html]http://www.coventryobserver.co.uk/2012/07/25/sport-Young-striker-Callum-Ball-signs-for-Sky-Blues-on-loan-45931.html Actually Im wrong, it was not part of the deal, which would make it very strange is we got no money for him 'http://www.dcfcfans.co.uk/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/ohmy' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':o' /> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davenportram Posted August 1, 2012 Author Share Posted August 1, 2012 I'll clarify my Ball comment. If the loan was part of the deal then it will have been cash plus the loan. Or the undisclosed fee plus the loan, so the fee indicated by RD will be the amount paid and the whole deal will be that amount plus ball. Thereby Ball generates no income not reduces the outgoings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.