Jump to content

Hulse


Whoneedshuls

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 29
  • Created
  • Last Reply
He said we haven't got the quality players to challenge for a top 6/10 finish shot himself in the foot there as they shouldn't of sold hulse and varny don't care wat they were on or mac they bought the ***** that's going to take us down instead.

Hmmmmm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always said we didn't need hulse and am I right or am I right.

Kuqi is better albeit older and he ain't afraid to tackle unlike hulse was. I finally see a decent side starting to emerge we still miss brayford down the right

Aye you might have been right - I disagreed with the timing. I believe as a general rule you only sell your 'unwanted' players after acquiring their replacement - Clough senior always did this as I recall. Gemmill replaced Carlin, Todd for Mackay etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was it bad timing? One way to look at it is that he still injured, if he kept him and then got a replacement in, he couldn't play anyway

good point maybe clough is thinking to get kuqi in on a years perm in january cheapish.

think we need to sign bueno up on a 2year deal even if it costs 2mill before someone of the likes of newcastle stoke wigan sign him up on the cheap as he looks like a very talented young midfielder/striker in the right side, and hes clever too. be a shame to loose him at the end of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hulse was getting more and more injury prone towards the end of his time at Derby and it was a good time to sell him, shame we didn't get 4 mill like 'Boro were offering last year.

Thank you for the goals Rob, especially the ones v Forest.:D

We do need to sign a permanent striker in January though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...