Ovis aries Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 I would say we are definitely going to offload a few players soon, and not loans. We will I think be out to claw back a few millions , Maybe Martin , Hendrick and Russell and Bryson in the frame Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich84 Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 Why? 2 first choice players in the last game, 1 ROI international that arguably should have been in the line up (most think 433 should have been used so he would have been) and 1(recovering from injury) that lots believe we are missing his energy in midfield......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DEL Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 59 minutes ago, Ovis aries said: I would say we are definitely going to offload a few players soon, and not loans. We will I think be out to claw back a few millions , Maybe Martin , Hendrick and Russell and Bryson in the frame Or definitely not! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ossieram Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 59 minutes ago, Ovis aries said: I would say we are definitely going to offload a few players soon, and not loans. We will I think be out to claw back a few millions , Maybe Martin , Hendrick and Russell and Bryson in the frame What does Mel say? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eddie Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 2 minutes ago, Rich84 said: Why? Can't make our minds up who should be the scapegoat, so need to offload all of possible candidates and start the search again. Curse you, Richard Keogh, for over-complicating things by returning to top form. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srg Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 Just now, eddie said: Can't make our minds up who should be the scapegoat, so need to offload all of possible candidates and start the search again. Curse you, Richard Keogh, for over-complicating things by returning to top form. Ince had a go, then shattered everyone's dreams, bless him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sexydadbod Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 Nothing wrong with that as long as they are better replacements Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WorksopRam Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 I think I preferred it when we were ****. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sexydadbod Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 Just now, WorksopRam said: I think I preferred it when we were ****. No u don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomsdubs Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 Never had these worries under Nige Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ovis aries Posted January 14, 2016 Author Share Posted January 14, 2016 40 minutes ago, Rich84 said: Why? 2 first choice players in the last game, 1 ROI international that arguably should have been in the line up (most think 433 should have been used so he would have been) and 1(recovering from injury) that lots believe we are missing his energy in midfield......... Don't get money for bit players that's why, I just think we will offload , and these four are possible candidates. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Mills Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 18 minutes ago, Ovis aries said: Don't get money for bit players that's why, I just think we will offload , and these four are possible candidates. I think giving £23k to Hartlepool shows that money is not top of Mels priority list Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ovis aries Posted January 14, 2016 Author Share Posted January 14, 2016 2 minutes ago, Chris Mills said: I think giving £23k to Hartlepool shows that money is not top of Mels priority list 25k is not 7or8 million Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RESS511 Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 Martin has been first choice striker all season (and before), the only way we'd sell him is if we were offered big money which is unlikely given his current form. Hendrick is the first choice back up to Thorne, Johnson and Butterfield so again I don't think we'd sell. If we are going to sell him I think it'd be in the summer after Hughes is back to full fitness. Russell I don't particularly rate and I felt he would struggle to get into the team with Ince, Weimann, Camara and Blackman also in the squad but Clement clearly rates him highly as he starts the majority of games. Like Martin we'd only sell for big money, but not to a promotion rival and I doubt any Premier League teams would take a punt on him. Bryson potentially could go given the depth of our midfield. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.