Sexydadbod Posted November 2, 2014 Share Posted November 2, 2014 It seems that I offended a lot of users and craig bryson himself with my last topic so I do apologise. We will have to agree to disagree with that argument. Anyways I have come up with a plan b formation instead of the 4-2-4, which leaves us far too open in midfield, so I would like your feedback on it. butland christie shotton keogh forsyth mascarell hendrick bryson hughes dawkins Martin Christie and Forsyth would provide the width and this formation would esnure we would have the control in the midfield. Even though I want bryson to be dropped I understand that steve mac would never do that so I have included him but also included dawkins to play just off the striker. Think we can all agree that best has been awful so 4-2-4 is pointless . As a result I would like to see this formation if our main formation isn't working Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorne Posted November 2, 2014 Share Posted November 2, 2014 WE DONT NEED TO CHANGE THE BLOODY FORMATION Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorne Posted November 2, 2014 Share Posted November 2, 2014 No width Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AmericanRam Posted November 2, 2014 Share Posted November 2, 2014 Meh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sexydadbod Posted November 2, 2014 Author Share Posted November 2, 2014 WE DONT NEED TO CHANGE THE BLOODY FORMATION Read it properly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorne Posted November 2, 2014 Share Posted November 2, 2014 Read it properly I did. That's why I said it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sexydadbod Posted November 2, 2014 Author Share Posted November 2, 2014 You obviously didn't. I suggested this formation instead of 4-2-4 if our main formation isn't working Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorne Posted November 2, 2014 Share Posted November 2, 2014 You obviously didn't. I suggested this formation instead of 4-2-4 if our main formation isn't working You wouldn't have suggested it if you didn't think it wasn't working, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sexydadbod Posted November 2, 2014 Author Share Posted November 2, 2014 obviously there has been a lot of occassions where mac has felt the need to change the formation as he has changed to 4-2-4 a lot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-JW- Posted November 2, 2014 Share Posted November 2, 2014 Do you know what a proper noun is rammy lad?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sexydadbod Posted November 2, 2014 Author Share Posted November 2, 2014 Do you know what a proper noun is rammy lad?? I couldn't care less about gramatical mistakes. This is a forum after all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-JW- Posted November 2, 2014 Share Posted November 2, 2014 I couldn't care less about gramatical mistakes. This is a forum after all. Fair enoguh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sexydadbod Posted November 2, 2014 Author Share Posted November 2, 2014 I would go back to put their names in capitals but I can't be bothered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rev Posted November 2, 2014 Share Posted November 2, 2014 Steve Mac would never drop Bryson? Apart from our biggest game in years, obviously! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sexydadbod Posted November 2, 2014 Author Share Posted November 2, 2014 Steve Mac would never drop Bryson? Apart from our biggest game in years, obviously! Which one was that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rev Posted November 2, 2014 Share Posted November 2, 2014 Which one was that? Surely you jest, or is your memory a little Rusty? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AmericanRam Posted November 2, 2014 Share Posted November 2, 2014 Surely you jest? Probably not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RadioactiveWaste Posted November 2, 2014 Share Posted November 2, 2014 Butland Shotton Buxton Whitbread Keogh Dawkins Eustace Bryson Mascarell Ibe Best I think it has merit. If Martin is injured or out of for and we drop Fozzy and Christie and have a definate ned to shoot outselves in the foot whilst playing people out of position and ignoring all common sense. It includes Mascarell, Eustace, Dawkins and Bryson, so everyone's happy, it gives Best a chance to prove himself. What's not to like? I can make up formations too. It's pointless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alph Posted November 3, 2014 Share Posted November 3, 2014 We tried a different system in a friendly. Burton maybe? Tried a diamond. Kind of poohed on our fluency. Nobody quite had that instinctive passing. We switched it back and improved massively in the second half I think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 3, 2014 Share Posted November 3, 2014 Lineup is fine ... Fornation is fine ... Just keep Hughes Bryson in there every game ... The coaching staff dropped Hughes and learned their lesson .. Stay the course Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.