sage Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 It was interesting that for all the slating NC got some fans about the CB situation. before today we hadn't conceded a goal from a CB being beaten in the air. Today we conceded 3 goals in one half from that situation. Ironic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davenportram Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 It was interesting that for all the slating NC got some fans about the CB situation. before today we hadn't conceded a goal from a CB being beaten in the air. Today we conceded 3 goals in one half from that situation. Ironic. Maybe not by a centre back being beaten in the air but by them losing players they were marking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sage Posted October 1, 2013 Author Share Posted October 1, 2013 Maybe not by a centre back being beaten in the air but by them losing players they were marking. nope, I was including that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davenportram Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 nope, I was including that. Sure we've conceded from crosses before tonight where nether Buxton or Keogh got anywhere near. Buxton drifting away from his man against Millwall Buxton lunging in giving away a daft free kick against Burnley Burnley player running through us and shrugging off Buxton Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sage Posted October 1, 2013 Author Share Posted October 1, 2013 It was interesting that for all the slating NC got some fans about the CB situation. before today we hadn't conceded a goal from a CB being beaten in the air. Today we conceded 3 goals in one half from that situation. Ironic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mostyn6 Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 Conceding ***** goals is conceding ***** goals. I think the irony is that for the last five years, I thought you wasn't allowed to make a tactical change until the 82nd minute. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestLondonRam Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 It's actually 70 mins first sub and second 82-87 mins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastKentRam Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 Most pointless thread ever......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bris Vegas Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 Pointless given that the majority of people complained about our CB's lack of speed, movement, tackling, organization and most of all Keogh's ridiculous diving in.. I didn't see many posts saying how rubbish our Cb's were because they were constantly beaten in the air. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mostyn6 Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 Conceding ***** goals is conceding ***** goals. I think the irony is that for the last five years, I thought you wasn't allowed to make a tactical change until the 82nd minute. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sage Posted October 2, 2013 Author Share Posted October 2, 2013 Most pointless thread ever......... Why pointless? Three goals from cb mistakes affer that being a bone of contention. Sorry for straying off the agenda one last time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sage Posted October 2, 2013 Author Share Posted October 2, 2013 Pointless given that the majority of people complained about our CB's lack of speed, movement, tackling, organization and most of all Keogh's ridiculous diving in.. I didn't see many posts saying how rubbish our Cb's were because they were constantly beaten in the air. Loads of posts on here blaming the cb's for goals re conceded from crosses and corners when it was full backs or midfielders being beaten , so yes it's ironic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.