Highgate Posted July 16, 2013 Share Posted July 16, 2013 Honestly, i think he would have been a very good signing for 1 or 2 years. Always gives 100% , so he wouldn't just see this as a final pay day, and he has years of experience in the Premier League. Man City's player of the year 4 years in a row at one stage (2005-2008). Just don't think we could compete with QPR on wages. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RodleyRam Posted July 17, 2013 Share Posted July 17, 2013 Honestly, i think he would have been a very good signing for 1 or 2 years. Always gives 100% , so he wouldn't just see this as a final pay day, and he has years of experience in the Premier League. Man City's player of the year 4 years in a row at one stage (2005-2008). Just don't think we could compete with QPR on wages. I believe you'll find the forum convention is to agree that he is ***** and wouldn't have improved us anyway... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Highgate Posted July 17, 2013 Share Posted July 17, 2013 I believe you'll find the forum convention is to agree that he is ***** and wouldn't have improved us anyway... Oh right....well in that case i think we'll be far better off without the possibly marginally overweight has-been. Who needs a second rate Bucko substitute when you have the real thing? How's that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RodleyRam Posted July 17, 2013 Share Posted July 17, 2013 Oh right....well in that case i think we'll be far better off without the possibly marginally overweight has-been. Who needs a second rate Bucko substitute when you have the real thing? How's that? Learning, you are, mmm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.