PrivateDerby Posted June 23, 2013 Share Posted June 23, 2013 Sorry i don't know what operation solstice is / was but you've made it sound like the Sharpesville Massacre - really beating up children? Tell us more. Think it was some sort of pagan protest at Stonehenge that pretty much lasted a day! I could be wrong though? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sheeponacid Posted June 23, 2013 Share Posted June 23, 2013 Sorry i don't know what operation solstice is / was but you've made it sound like the Sharpesville Massacre - really beating up children? Tell us more. There are rotten apples in every barrel of human kind i'm sure but from my experience i can't say "many" amongst their ranks Hiya mate....not quite a massacre, but for me it was & remains a black day for British policing....operation solstice was the code name given by the police for their plan to prevent many peaceful people from being able to enter the Stonehenge site for what was at the time a legal free peace festival, this consisted primarily of blocking off the access & egress points for the road leaving us basically trapped & then systematically dragging everybody from their vehicles, mainly by force......have to admit my mind was very foggy that day (it was a bad trip in more than one way & no I wasnt driving)...but it was not a pleasant experience, with strong arm police tactics.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sheeponacid Posted June 23, 2013 Share Posted June 23, 2013 Beating children is probably a little strong, so apologies....lets say roughly handling children is probably a little more accurate...various court cases have been brought against the police following this day...as to how successful they were, I'm not to sure... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
martin1980 Posted June 23, 2013 Author Share Posted June 23, 2013 Sorry mate I got the wrong end of the stick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
notts_ram Posted June 23, 2013 Share Posted June 23, 2013 If the guy was found not guilty now then logically doesnt this mean that the 3 people whom colluded should be charged with wasting police time and or perjury? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramble On Posted June 28, 2013 Share Posted June 28, 2013 I recognise this chap I used to stand the row behind him at the match, in 2 seasons I never heard any racist comments at all in fact I believe there was a time where it nearly kicked off with him and this other bloke who was being racist during a game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srg Posted June 28, 2013 Share Posted June 28, 2013 If the guy was found not guilty now then logically doesnt this mean that the 3 people whom colluded should be charged with wasting police time and or perjury? Not if that's genuinely what they thought they heard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
notts_ram Posted June 28, 2013 Share Posted June 28, 2013 Not if that's genuinely what they thought they heard. This is whats wrong with the entire case, are we saying that on the balance of probabilties all 3 of them "misheard" what this guy was saying, or all 3 of them have some hearing disorder I'd have said very unlikely especially due to the close proximity to where they were sitting in relation to this guy, if so then it would point to the fact that these 3 people colluded with one another and if the guy has been found guilty they should be charged with wasting police time and/or perjury. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.