Jump to content

Miller should have gone too !


CapeTownRams

Recommended Posts

Miller should have also been sent off last satdee for two yellows. Check the incident when he got booked for dissent. Firstly he stops play by deliberately handballing...that's a yellow card offence. He then commits dissent by throwing the ball down (for which he DID get booked) - another and (should have been) second yellow...and therefore a red.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 9
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Miller should have also been sent off last satdee for two yellows. Check the incident when he got booked for dissent. Firstly he stops play by deliberately handballing...that's a yellow card offence. He then commits dissent by throwing the ball down (for which he DID get booked) - another and (should have been) second yellow...and therefore a red.

If he got booked for the handball, he may reacted differently when it came to the "dissent". I don't see the point of this thread unless he got booked first and did something to get a second yellow but didn't second.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he got booked for the handball, he may reacted differently when it came to the "dissent". I don't see the point of this thread unless he got booked first and did something to get a second yellow but didn't second.

Well he did throw a marry and boot the post at one point, does that count or is it just reason to call him a **** in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He should have been booked for fouling Frankie.

Still, as others have pointed out, the humiliation was, and is, total.

Sublime.

That advert in the NEP, excellent work.

As they say in jockland.....GIRFUY........ 'http://www.dcfcfans.co.uk/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':lol:' /> 'http://www.dcfcfans.co.uk/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':lol:' /> 'http://www.dcfcfans.co.uk/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':lol:' /> 'http://www.dcfcfans.co.uk/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':D' /> 'http://www.dcfcfans.co.uk/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':D' /> 'http://www.dcfcfans.co.uk/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':D' />

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To answer your query, he shouldn't have been sent off as both offences happened more or less simultaneously, so therefore the offence with the most severe punishment is the one what is dealt with. As they were both caution-able offences then only one caution can stand.

Hope that clears it up for you. I noticed it at the match and was quite impressed, well impressed isn't the word really, but I was pleased for the referee that only a caution was shown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...