Jump to content

Clough's winter of discontent

joely22

By joely22
in Derby County Forum

Recommended Posts

joely22

joely22

Posted
Posted

Derby County looked in fine shape several months into the current campaign. However, a dose of the winter wobbles has seen the Rams slide down the table at an alarming rate. With relations cooling at Pride Park, Nigel Clough now finds himself under fire. David Bevan examines what went wrong once the frost set in.

Questions were not being asked about Nigel Clough when the team was flying through October and November and, believe me, Derby were absolutely flying. “The best I’ve seen since Jim Smith.†“The best football since George Burley.†No-one was mentioning Billy Davies, despite promotion and continuous good runs of form. The football just wasn’t entertaining then.

A trip to Burnley changed Derby’s season completely.

Half the pitch was frosty. It was hard. Star man Kris Commons was injured and the other creative spark, Alberto Bueno, was injured early on. The Rams still managed to snatch a lead but the football wasn’t pretty, or at least not to the standard Derby fans had come to expect.

One goal to the good and ten minutes from third spot in the league. The Rams well and truly threw it away, conceding two goals in the final few minutes. It wasn’t just the game that was thrown away, it was effectively their season. Since then, Derby have gone on to pick up a meagre five points and plummeted to 17th in the league. Oh, and don’t mention the FA Cup humiliation to non-League Crawley Town sandwiched between all of that.

So why has it gone so pear-shaped for the side that was flying the flag for the East Midlands?

Well, during the good run of form, Frank Fielding, Shefki Kuqi and Luke Moore had all arrived on loan from Blackburn, Swansea and West Brom respectively. Fielding proved to be a gem of a signing, keeping three clean sheets and helping the side to 15 points from a possible 21. The loss of Stephen Bywater, who at the time had been in solid form, hardly went noticed. In hindsight, Fielding was an improvement on Bywater and the Rams would do well to sign him permanently in the summer.

Despite the initial panic, Kuqi also turned out to be a good signing. God knows why Clough didn’t try to bring him in after he was released by Swansea. Derby could certainly do with him, because he was exactly what they needed. Kuqi led the line in a way not seen since Steve Howard’s targetman role during the promotion season. His ability to hold the ball up and link play was superb, allowing the creative trio of Commons, Bueno and Cywka to do what they did best. Those three weren’t the same after Kuqi left.

Luke Moore also did well. Not as well as Kuqi, but he was preferred in the lone role by Clough and by the time Moore had broken into the side, Kuqi’s form had wavered slightly. Moore had pace, which Kuqi didn’t, but his overall play wasn’t a patch on what Kuqi had offered. Back then the team just worked. Players were being played in their correct positions and there was continuity to the side.

So, come January, the players that had made the team stronger throughout the beginning of winter had left. Bywater was fit again, Kuqi’s loan had expired and Moore left for Swansea. Again, the strikers haven’t been replaced. Since then, a semi-fit Chris Porter has been at the tip of the formation. A player who has been out with a hip injury for two years and played only 40 games. His style of play doesn’t fit the 4-2-3-1 system, which has been favoured this season. In all honesty, many Derby supporters don’t know what system Chris Porter does fit into.

The problem for Clough is that he doesn’t have enough options in his squad. He has signed a steady amount of players during his tenure but they lack the quality needed to mount anything approaching a promotion push and, without significant investment, the current league position is where the club will remain. Other than Shaun Barker, there hasn’t been a player signed by Clough who has consistently shone. Barker is without question the best signing he has made. He is also the only player that has been signed for significant money. Coincidence?

James Bailey, for example, has had a patchy first season. Excellent during the good spell, average during the bad. In all honesty, you can say the same for Dean Moxey, John Brayford and Tomasz Cywka. All of a similar age. All costing a similar price. All returning similar levels of performance and there’s an obvious reason for that. They’re not surrounded by enough quality. It’s the quality players that come up trumps during the bad times and Derby just don’t have enough of them any more. They were at the club. They were allowed to leave. Now the price is being paid.

Over the past few weeks, Clough has become more angry and frustrated in his interviews culminating in the vicious personal attack on Cywka only last weekend. Derby fans are becoming frustrated with the results, understandably. A win would have been an excellent result but to brand his own signing as “a very inexperienced player and not a very bright footballer†is, without question, a disgrace. What sort of relationship does the player now have with the manager?

The player may not think much of it but what of his team-mates? Will they be playing nervously, desperate not to make a mistake because they know they’re in for an earful from their boss? What confidence does that restore in a squad whose morale is already low? It seemed as if the whole frustration of the past transfer window culminated into that moment, namely having had to sell his star player for a pittance and not being able to replace him with sufficient quality.

Clough must have been sure that, given significant backing during the window, he could have got his side within reach of the play-offs. The club was in the mix in November, add a bit of quality to the side and they could have been there or thereabouts. That’s what Wolves did. That’s what Clough wanted.

There has been a loss of faith in Clough during the recent poor run of results. His tactics baffle at times, as do the timings of his substitutions or lack thereof. There is also the situation regarding Cywka and Clough’s constant battering of players in the press. None have been as bad as the Cywka incident, but he is constantly chipping away at his players and their confidence is being eaten away by the man supposedly there to inspire. It is poor man management and if the players need anything at the moment, it’s confidence.

On the other hand, it is easy to forget the excellent run of form that occurred at the beginning of the season. If the manager can motivate the squad to play like that, then why shouldn’t he carry on? Of course a manager’s tenure at a club cannot be decided over a two-month period of good results. There have been plenty of bad results and performances during Clough’s time at Derby.

Clough wanted to follow the model set by Wolverhampton Wanderers by signing younger players. He has done that. Those younger players are going to improve as the weeks, months and seasons progress, but what is needed now is the quality to give those players the confidence to continue. The problem being that quality costs money and the board hasn’t dipped into its own pocket enough.

Perhaps giving a relatively inexperienced manager by name of Clough the job in the first place was part of the Americans’ plan all along? Knowing that it would be virtually impossible to sack a man with that surname, the pressure would cease for a considerable time more. Eventually, the pressure from fans has come to the board before the man in charge.

Maybe Clough will be replaced in the summer, doing the job that he was brought in to do. Save money and keep the club in the division. Championship safety is by no means secure at the time of writing, but if Clough was to keep Derby in the division could the board replace him with a more experienced head and throw some money at him?

It may not be a bad plan after all, but for Derby supporters to pin their hopes on the club’s American owners appears to be a huge risk. Clough may have another year in the job. He signed a three and a half year deal when he arrived in January 2009. Enough may then be enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply
dcfcdavecov

dcfcdavecov

Posted
Posted
Derby County looked in fine shape several months into the current campaign. However, a dose of the winter wobbles has seen the Rams slide down the table at an alarming rate. With relations cooling at Pride Park, Nigel Clough now finds himself under fire. David Bevan examines what went wrong once the frost set in.

Questions were not being asked about Nigel Clough when the team was flying through October and November and, believe me, Derby were absolutely flying. “The best I’ve seen since Jim Smith.†“The best football since George Burley.†No-one was mentioning Billy Davies, despite promotion and continuous good runs of form. The football just wasn’t entertaining then.

A trip to Burnley changed Derby’s season completely.

Half the pitch was frosty. It was hard. Star man Kris Commons was injured and the other creative spark, Alberto Bueno, was injured early on. The Rams still managed to snatch a lead but the football wasn’t pretty, or at least not to the standard Derby fans had come to expect.

One goal to the good and ten minutes from third spot in the league. The Rams well and truly threw it away, conceding two goals in the final few minutes. It wasn’t just the game that was thrown away, it was effectively their season. Since then, Derby have gone on to pick up a meagre five points and plummeted to 17th in the league. Oh, and don’t mention the FA Cup humiliation to non-League Crawley Town sandwiched between all of that.

So why has it gone so pear-shaped for the side that was flying the flag for the East Midlands?

Well, during the good run of form, Frank Fielding, Shefki Kuqi and Luke Moore had all arrived on loan from Blackburn, Swansea and West Brom respectively. Fielding proved to be a gem of a signing, keeping three clean sheets and helping the side to 15 points from a possible 21. The loss of Stephen Bywater, who at the time had been in solid form, hardly went noticed. In hindsight, Fielding was an improvement on Bywater and the Rams would do well to sign him permanently in the summer.

Despite the initial panic, Kuqi also turned out to be a good signing. God knows why Clough didn’t try to bring him in after he was released by Swansea. Derby could certainly do with him, because he was exactly what they needed. Kuqi led the line in a way not seen since Steve Howard’s targetman role during the promotion season. His ability to hold the ball up and link play was superb, allowing the creative trio of Commons, Bueno and Cywka to do what they did best. Those three weren’t the same after Kuqi left.

Luke Moore also did well. Not as well as Kuqi, but he was preferred in the lone role by Clough and by the time Moore had broken into the side, Kuqi’s form had wavered slightly. Moore had pace, which Kuqi didn’t, but his overall play wasn’t a patch on what Kuqi had offered. Back then the team just worked. Players were being played in their correct positions and there was continuity to the side.

So, come January, the players that had made the team stronger throughout the beginning of winter had left. Bywater was fit again, Kuqi’s loan had expired and Moore left for Swansea. Again, the strikers haven’t been replaced. Since then, a semi-fit Chris Porter has been at the tip of the formation. A player who has been out with a hip injury for two years and played only 40 games. His style of play doesn’t fit the 4-2-3-1 system, which has been favoured this season. In all honesty, many Derby supporters don’t know what system Chris Porter does fit into.

The problem for Clough is that he doesn’t have enough options in his squad. He has signed a steady amount of players during his tenure but they lack the quality needed to mount anything approaching a promotion push and, without significant investment, the current league position is where the club will remain. Other than Shaun Barker, there hasn’t been a player signed by Clough who has consistently shone. Barker is without question the best signing he has made. He is also the only player that has been signed for significant money. Coincidence?

James Bailey, for example, has had a patchy first season. Excellent during the good spell, average during the bad. In all honesty, you can say the same for Dean Moxey, John Brayford and Tomasz Cywka. All of a similar age. All costing a similar price. All returning similar levels of performance and there’s an obvious reason for that. They’re not surrounded by enough quality. It’s the quality players that come up trumps during the bad times and Derby just don’t have enough of them any more. They were at the club. They were allowed to leave. Now the price is being paid.

Over the past few weeks, Clough has become more angry and frustrated in his interviews culminating in the vicious personal attack on Cywka only last weekend. Derby fans are becoming frustrated with the results, understandably. A win would have been an excellent result but to brand his own signing as “a very inexperienced player and not a very bright footballer†is, without question, a disgrace. What sort of relationship does the player now have with the manager?

The player may not think much of it but what of his team-mates? Will they be playing nervously, desperate not to make a mistake because they know they’re in for an earful from their boss? What confidence does that restore in a squad whose morale is already low? It seemed as if the whole frustration of the past transfer window culminated into that moment, namely having had to sell his star player for a pittance and not being able to replace him with sufficient quality.

Clough must have been sure that, given significant backing during the window, he could have got his side within reach of the play-offs. The club was in the mix in November, add a bit of quality to the side and they could have been there or thereabouts. That’s what Wolves did. That’s what Clough wanted.

There has been a loss of faith in Clough during the recent poor run of results. His tactics baffle at times, as do the timings of his substitutions or lack thereof. There is also the situation regarding Cywka and Clough’s constant battering of players in the press. None have been as bad as the Cywka incident, but he is constantly chipping away at his players and their confidence is being eaten away by the man supposedly there to inspire. It is poor man management and if the players need anything at the moment, it’s confidence.

On the other hand, it is easy to forget the excellent run of form that occurred at the beginning of the season. If the manager can motivate the squad to play like that, then why shouldn’t he carry on? Of course a manager’s tenure at a club cannot be decided over a two-month period of good results. There have been plenty of bad results and performances during Clough’s time at Derby.

Clough wanted to follow the model set by Wolverhampton Wanderers by signing younger players. He has done that. Those younger players are going to improve as the weeks, months and seasons progress, but what is needed now is the quality to give those players the confidence to continue. The problem being that quality costs money and the board hasn’t dipped into its own pocket enough.

Perhaps giving a relatively inexperienced manager by name of Clough the job in the first place was part of the Americans’ plan all along? Knowing that it would be virtually impossible to sack a man with that surname, the pressure would cease for a considerable time more. Eventually, the pressure from fans has come to the board before the man in charge.

Maybe Clough will be replaced in the summer, doing the job that he was brought in to do. Save money and keep the club in the division. Championship safety is by no means secure at the time of writing, but if Clough was to keep Derby in the division could the board replace him with a more experienced head and throw some money at him?

It may not be a bad plan after all, but for Derby supporters to pin their hopes on the club’s American owners appears to be a huge risk. Clough may have another year in the job. He signed a three and a half year deal when he arrived in January 2009. Enough may then be enough.

I think this is an example of blatantly making a post longer than it should be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Belper Bear

Belper Bear

Posted
Posted

It's pretty much in line with what many Rams fans have said to me over the last week. Gefore anyone climbs on their high horse I'm NOT anti Clough, I just think he's made one or two mistakes recently. One thing I do believe though is our current board and manager set up will not do us any good. Something must change - I just don't know what.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
dcfcdavecov

dcfcdavecov

Posted
Posted
It's pretty much in line with what many Rams fans have said to me over the last week. Gefore anyone climbs on their high horse I'm NOT anti Clough, I just think he's made one or two mistakes recently. One thing I do believe though is our current board and manager set up will not do us any good. Something must change - I just don't know what.

http://www.tiricosuave.com/images/highhorse

Feckin anti-Clough nazi!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Alph

Alph

Posted
Posted

It's nice to read about football though for the first few paragraphs.

I remember entering the run of fixtures Burnley, Norwich, Reading etc and thinking it's a potential season breaker. There were about 5 tricky fixtures coming up and although it was possible to win them all, it was unlikely. A draw seemed an acceptable result in the away games. Maybe even a win at Bristol. We were flying so really only 3 points would do in the home games. Any less would be accepted by us but not very welcome.

At the time though there was this gut feeling that it's possible to lose the lot. Even if that dropped us out the Play-Offs i would never of believed we'd of continued to get beaten right into Feb. That we'd come up against Leicester on Feb 12th with only 1 win added!

We almost got 3 points at Burnley. Then it looked like we'd get 1. In the end we got nothing. Against Norwich and Reading we showed enough to win the games, but we didn't have the finishing touch that these sides had. Soft goals were given away. Bristol City, again, could of had things wrapped up. James brought Commons down, got away with it and then Derby were punished. Another game where we were NEARLY good enough.

I thought we had the team to pick up after those though. But we've all seen it go from one kick in the teeth to another.

I think Burnley, Norwich, Reading and Bristol City games were tough fixtures. Had we got some points off them then the team would of continued shining. As it was we got nothing. Then we were beaten by Forest 5-2 and the nail was in the coffin.

Form, confidence and steady tempers have all gone to pot.

5 tricky games (ones that if you win, people tend to take you very seriously) chart Derby's fall from promotion chase to relegation battle.

In those 5 fixtures a real promotion contender would of turned those losses into desperate draws and moved onto the next game with confidence intact.

Gutted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ramsbottom

ramsbottom

Posted
Posted
Derby County looked in fine shape several months into the current campaign. However, a dose of the winter wobbles has seen the Rams slide down the table at an alarming rate. With relations cooling at Pride Park, Nigel Clough now finds himself under fire. David Bevan examines what went wrong once the frost set in.

Questions were not being asked about Nigel Clough when the team was flying through October and November and, believe me, Derby were absolutely flying. “The best I’ve seen since Jim Smith.†“The best football since George Burley.†No-one was mentioning Billy Davies, despite promotion and continuous good runs of form. The football just wasn’t entertaining then.

A trip to Burnley changed Derby’s season completely.

Half the pitch was frosty. It was hard. Star man Kris Commons was injured and the other creative spark, Alberto Bueno, was injured early on. The Rams still managed to snatch a lead but the football wasn’t pretty, or at least not to the standard Derby fans had come to expect.

One goal to the good and ten minutes from third spot in the league. The Rams well and truly threw it away, conceding two goals in the final few minutes. It wasn’t just the game that was thrown away, it was effectively their season. Since then, Derby have gone on to pick up a meagre five points and plummeted to 17th in the league. Oh, and don’t mention the FA Cup humiliation to non-League Crawley Town sandwiched between all of that.

So why has it gone so pear-shaped for the side that was flying the flag for the East Midlands?

Well, during the good run of form, Frank Fielding, Shefki Kuqi and Luke Moore had all arrived on loan from Blackburn, Swansea and West Brom respectively. Fielding proved to be a gem of a signing, keeping three clean sheets and helping the side to 15 points from a possible 21. The loss of Stephen Bywater, who at the time had been in solid form, hardly went noticed. In hindsight, Fielding was an improvement on Bywater and the Rams would do well to sign him permanently in the summer.

Despite the initial panic, Kuqi also turned out to be a good signing. God knows why Clough didn’t try to bring him in after he was released by Swansea. Derby could certainly do with him, because he was exactly what they needed. Kuqi led the line in a way not seen since Steve Howard’s targetman role during the promotion season. His ability to hold the ball up and link play was superb, allowing the creative trio of Commons, Bueno and Cywka to do what they did best. Those three weren’t the same after Kuqi left.

Luke Moore also did well. Not as well as Kuqi, but he was preferred in the lone role by Clough and by the time Moore had broken into the side, Kuqi’s form had wavered slightly. Moore had pace, which Kuqi didn’t, but his overall play wasn’t a patch on what Kuqi had offered. Back then the team just worked. Players were being played in their correct positions and there was continuity to the side.

So, come January, the players that had made the team stronger throughout the beginning of winter had left. Bywater was fit again, Kuqi’s loan had expired and Moore left for Swansea. Again, the strikers haven’t been replaced. Since then, a semi-fit Chris Porter has been at the tip of the formation. A player who has been out with a hip injury for two years and played only 40 games. His style of play doesn’t fit the 4-2-3-1 system, which has been favoured this season. In all honesty, many Derby supporters don’t know what system Chris Porter does fit into.

The problem for Clough is that he doesn’t have enough options in his squad. He has signed a steady amount of players during his tenure but they lack the quality needed to mount anything approaching a promotion push and, without significant investment, the current league position is where the club will remain. Other than Shaun Barker, there hasn’t been a player signed by Clough who has consistently shone. Barker is without question the best signing he has made. He is also the only player that has been signed for significant money. Coincidence?

James Bailey, for example, has had a patchy first season. Excellent during the good spell, average during the bad. In all honesty, you can say the same for Dean Moxey, John Brayford and Tomasz Cywka. All of a similar age. All costing a similar price. All returning similar levels of performance and there’s an obvious reason for that. They’re not surrounded by enough quality. It’s the quality players that come up trumps during the bad times and Derby just don’t have enough of them any more. They were at the club. They were allowed to leave. Now the price is being paid.

Over the past few weeks, Clough has become more angry and frustrated in his interviews culminating in the vicious personal attack on Cywka only last weekend. Derby fans are becoming frustrated with the results, understandably. A win would have been an excellent result but to brand his own signing as “a very inexperienced player and not a very bright footballer†is, without question, a disgrace. What sort of relationship does the player now have with the manager?

The player may not think much of it but what of his team-mates? Will they be playing nervously, desperate not to make a mistake because they know they’re in for an earful from their boss? What confidence does that restore in a squad whose morale is already low? It seemed as if the whole frustration of the past transfer window culminated into that moment, namely having had to sell his star player for a pittance and not being able to replace him with sufficient quality.

Clough must have been sure that, given significant backing during the window, he could have got his side within reach of the play-offs. The club was in the mix in November, add a bit of quality to the side and they could have been there or thereabouts. That’s what Wolves did. That’s what Clough wanted.

There has been a loss of faith in Clough during the recent poor run of results. His tactics baffle at times, as do the timings of his substitutions or lack thereof. There is also the situation regarding Cywka and Clough’s constant battering of players in the press. None have been as bad as the Cywka incident, but he is constantly chipping away at his players and their confidence is being eaten away by the man supposedly there to inspire. It is poor man management and if the players need anything at the moment, it’s confidence.

On the other hand, it is easy to forget the excellent run of form that occurred at the beginning of the season. If the manager can motivate the squad to play like that, then why shouldn’t he carry on? Of course a manager’s tenure at a club cannot be decided over a two-month period of good results. There have been plenty of bad results and performances during Clough’s time at Derby.

Clough wanted to follow the model set by Wolverhampton Wanderers by signing younger players. He has done that. Those younger players are going to improve as the weeks, months and seasons progress, but what is needed now is the quality to give those players the confidence to continue. The problem being that quality costs money and the board hasn’t dipped into its own pocket enough.

Perhaps giving a relatively inexperienced manager by name of Clough the job in the first place was part of the Americans’ plan all along? Knowing that it would be virtually impossible to sack a man with that surname, the pressure would cease for a considerable time more. Eventually, the pressure from fans has come to the board before the man in charge.

Maybe Clough will be replaced in the summer, doing the job that he was brought in to do. Save money and keep the club in the division. Championship safety is by no means secure at the time of writing, but if Clough was to keep Derby in the division could the board replace him with a more experienced head and throw some money at him?

It may not be a bad plan after all, but for Derby supporters to pin their hopes on the club’s American owners appears to be a huge risk. Clough may have another year in the job. He signed a three and a half year deal when he arrived in January 2009. Enough may then be enough.

Pretty much says it all doesn't it. The guys not a supporter yet even he can see what's wrong...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
footymadme

footymadme

Posted
Posted

i do feel sorry for .......

Clough.

he must be his wits end .

to say what he said sat night when interviwed by radio ga-ga

when in the mind boiling heat of just losing 2 very valuable

points , he ,in my opinion showed his true feelings of how much

he is desperate to get his team functioning in a positive frame of

mind again.

i dont think for one nano second he meant a word of what came out

of his mouth and the players comments back that up..........

this is 'old ground' and i know that is initially what you all will be

thinking, but for me it opitomises what clough is having to put

up with , all brought about with the failure of the board to provide

him with the money to buy him some quality players ,ones that will

add experience and strength to a squad that so desperately need it.

the board now need to put up or shut up , or sell to an outfit that has

the fans needs in mind and the main reson we shell out our hard

earnt cash.........

put up or bugger off you lot............NOW.:mad:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...