Jump to content

Jeff Hendrick & ROI


Walsall_Ram

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 94
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I really really wouldn't. It's shocking defending. Abysmal. 

By that definition, then surely every time an attacker beats a defender it is 'shocking defending'. Alternatively, Hendrick completely 'out-skilled' three defenders in quick succession.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By that definition, then surely every time an attacker beats a defender it is 'shocking defending'. Alternatively, Hendrick completely 'out-skilled' three defenders in quick succession.

No, of course it isn't. The first move by Hendrick for example is nice play by him, albeit poor defending. The covering defender diving in when there's no need is abysmal. Left it on a plate for him. I could have taken it round him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, of course it isn't. The first move by Hendrick for example is nice play by him, albeit poor defending. The covering defender diving in when there's no need is abysmal. Left it on a plate for him. I could have taken it round him.

you have a double shuffle then in your locker. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've changed my mind about the first move, that's abysmal defending too. There's two of them for goodness sake. 

I stand by my original statement, then. You give Hendrick no credit whatsoever, which is just idiotic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It can be good play and abysmal defending. The two aren't mutually exclusive.

Yeah, I have to say you're talking a bit of nonsense here. At that speed, you have to say Hendrick deserves credit. His close control and foot movement prevented the defender from intercepting. It was almost Eden Hazard-esque.

Not my favourite player at the moment, and I've all but given up on him, BUT he deserves credit there cos he didn't allow the defence to do anything simple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...