RoyMac5

Which was needed why?

Edit: Twitter not auto-loading...

And that is why the first half, although there was not much in the way of end product, was better. We scored from a cross into the box - on the floor.

I'd forgotten some awful defending, how did they miss that one at the back stick that they put across the 6 yard box? We were lucky to get a point I reckon.

Well I guess so because Ward is no defender, but then who was the other wingback? I called it as a five for ease, it was a mess whatever it was.

Didn't we get Warne's idea of a 'good thing' in the second half, particularly after Hourihane went off? It was awful.

The player is running into the box with the ball, Ward is behind him and there's a challenge which brings their player down. It couldn't be anything but a penalty.

You are kidding right? We actually passed the ball about in the first half. What we got in the second half was more aimless balls high into the box and 5 at the back! 😄

Or not. What an awful display of non-football that second half was by us.

For a player who has had to be taken off at half time twice recently. Oh and a sending off.

We're awfully slow playing it around particularly from the back, don't think Hourihane is helping that tbh.

"I don't think there is a lack of aspiration to spend money," manager Warne told BBC Sport. "But there is a lack of energy to go down the same route that it has gone before, because obviously the club was in trouble. "With the players we have signed, they haven't been on contracts of the previous regime and we are trying to make a club that is going to be successful - but sustainably successful. And that's maybe not as sexy as it has been in the past. "I do think there is money to spend, but not of the eye-watering transfer money that happened in the previous regime..."