ap04

It's all that matters performance-wise (not xG which as you said has flaws but the 'perfect' metric including execution and other major events).
But nowhere near as much as goals (binary ie. useless). You'll always back xG or shots over goals to reflect the opponents' standing in a  game, or for A>B B>C A>C to check out.
All the final score gives you is probabilities of who was the better side (if any). Which for draws and 1-goal wins are less than 50%. You might as well ignore it.

Miles offside judging by the lines on the turf.
I did not argue the impact but the "hardly any big wrong calls our way" BS (also you can't be sure the game would have played out the same way had we not taken the lead).
Once foul is given 1 on 1 with the keeper & not playing the ball is clearest red imaginable, what do you mean by "no"?
Ok then I won't trust the freeze frame I'll trust you watching it real-time.
I disagree it was clear-cut (neither was the second) but my list was for mistakes in our favour, not against.
The OP did not say refs have cost us (don't know if they have), they said refs have been anti-Derby (they have not).
Seems half a yard off from that angle.
See above.
Agreed but this doesn't mean there haven't been several big calls in our favour, or more than those against.
Tight but looks like his leg was sticking out (cam behind the goal).

That would be fine if you had equally objected to the 40 or so posts following the first leg.

That would be fine if you had equally objected to the 40 or so posts following the first leg.