Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

I think most would agree, that for whatever reason a considerable amount of our second half performances have been far superior to that of the first half. It certainly happens too often to be a coincidence.

1. Is it Managerial nous in spotting a weakness in the opposition?

2. Subtle team positional alterations?

3. A motivational speech?

3. or even tired opposition?

Thoughts?

  • Replies 5
  • Views 705
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Most active in this topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Wrong, wrong, wrong Everyone knows that we are terrible in the second half. In fact we haven't scored in the last 14 minutes 20 seconds of a game this season. Apart from that game when we did of co

I'm just glad we don't give up those late goals all the time like we did in some part of last season.

Yes that seems to be the way, maybe it's because we have strong runners with stamina? Peterborough away must be the exception that proves the rule!

Wrong, wrong, wrong

Everyone knows that we are terrible in the second half. In fact we haven't scored in the last 14 minutes 20 seconds of a game this season. Apart from that game when we did of course.

I'm sure I've seen another thread on this recently. Nevermind, its still a valid point, although I'd just say our first half performances are that bad that they make the 2nd half performances look sensational.

Or is it so that Nigel is not able to prepare the team properly for the game and they are not ready ?

Create an account or sign in to comment