Pearson Posted March 9, 2012 Share Posted March 9, 2012 I think most would agree, that for whatever reason a considerable amount of our second half performances have been far superior to that of the first half. It certainly happens too often to be a coincidence. 1. Is it Managerial nous in spotting a weakness in the opposition? 2. Subtle team positional alterations? 3. A motivational speech? 3. or even tired opposition? Thoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cisse Posted March 9, 2012 Share Posted March 9, 2012 I'm just glad we don't give up those late goals all the time like we did in some part of last season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyB Posted March 9, 2012 Share Posted March 9, 2012 Yes that seems to be the way, maybe it's because we have strong runners with stamina? Peterborough away must be the exception that proves the rule! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sage Posted March 9, 2012 Share Posted March 9, 2012 Wrong, wrong, wrong Everyone knows that we are terrible in the second half. In fact we haven't scored in the last 14 minutes 20 seconds of a game this season. Apart from that game when we did of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
networker1884 Posted March 9, 2012 Share Posted March 9, 2012 I'm sure I've seen another thread on this recently. Nevermind, its still a valid point, although I'd just say our first half performances are that bad that they make the 2nd half performances look sensational. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cisse Posted March 9, 2012 Share Posted March 9, 2012 Or is it so that Nigel is not able to prepare the team properly for the game and they are not ready ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.