Pulpman Posted September 1, 2012 Share Posted September 1, 2012 I heard today that Shackell was sold because he wasn't liked by the rest of the squad and wound them up. It was also the reason Davies left for personal reasons and that after Shackell was sold Davies didn't want to leave but the club had already decided to let him go so they could get Sammon. Obviously I don't know how true but wondered what you lot thought about it. It does make some sort of sense. Discuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCFCfranco Posted September 1, 2012 Share Posted September 1, 2012 Are we allowed to say this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uttoxram75 Posted September 1, 2012 Share Posted September 1, 2012 Discuss? I'm still discussing why we paid 300K for Derek Hales..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DcFc Dyycheee Posted September 1, 2012 Share Posted September 1, 2012 Does anyone even care now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RamNut Posted September 1, 2012 Share Posted September 1, 2012 Wrong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RamNut Posted September 1, 2012 Share Posted September 1, 2012 Discuss? I'm still discussing why we paid 300K for Derek Hales..... When we should have had duncan mckenzie...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Teale Posted September 1, 2012 Share Posted September 1, 2012 I got told as he was on very very good wages and wanted him out to give them room in the budget, I did post this before he was sold. One of the coaching staff was quite open about it to eevryone at a golf day, he is good with his hands Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pulpman Posted September 1, 2012 Author Share Posted September 1, 2012 Wrong Why wrong? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
networker1884 Posted September 1, 2012 Share Posted September 1, 2012 Shackell who? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-JW- Posted September 1, 2012 Share Posted September 1, 2012 Jason who?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-JW- Posted September 1, 2012 Share Posted September 1, 2012 Shackell who? ******* beat me to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PistoldPete Posted September 1, 2012 Share Posted September 1, 2012 I heard today that Shackell was sold because he wasn't liked by the rest of the squad and wound them up. It was also the reason Davies left for personal reasons and that after Shackell was sold Davies didn't want to leave but the club had already decided to let him go so they could get Sammon. Obviously I don't know how true but wondered what you lot thought about it. It does make some sort of sense. Discuss. I think that we sold Shackell cos Clough wanted keogh as he thinks hes a better player. And I think Clough may be right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RamNut Posted September 1, 2012 Share Posted September 1, 2012 Why wrong? 1. Steve Davis's dad said that whatever the issue was it was on going for 18 months. Shacks was only here for 9. 2. Nigel would not cow tow to player power. 3. Shackell was a top bloke and a star. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uttoxram75 Posted September 1, 2012 Share Posted September 1, 2012 I think Nigel Clough knows what he's doing. There, I've said it. I think he knows more about football than most of us. Outrageous but true........... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCFCfranco Posted September 1, 2012 Share Posted September 1, 2012 You must be drunk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uttoxram75 Posted September 1, 2012 Share Posted September 1, 2012 You must be drunk. You have no idea................................ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCFCfranco Posted September 1, 2012 Share Posted September 1, 2012 You have no idea................................ You said cough in so I imagine on a scale of 1 to ten it's an 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCFC1983 Posted September 1, 2012 Share Posted September 1, 2012 I have posted before regarding this topic. I was informed the reasons why shackell left were: 1) Financial. 2) The manager wanted a more intense type of defender. Especially after Barkers injury. 3) There was an element of Shackell having an influence on the group that wasn't always positive. That's not to say he wasn't popular amongst the other players. He was. But there is only one main man at the club and that's the manager. As i understand a combination of the above factors led to him leaving. I also have been informed that the fee was more than that which was widely reported. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uttoxram75 Posted September 1, 2012 Share Posted September 1, 2012 I have information that says Nigel Clough knows what he's doing. It may be unpopular. I'll say no more. We are Derby. I am Derby. I drink therefore I am. 'http://www.dcfcfans.co.uk/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/ohmy' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':o' /> 'http://www.dcfcfans.co.uk/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wacko' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':wacko:' /> 'http://www.dcfcfans.co.uk/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':D' /> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subman Posted September 1, 2012 Share Posted September 1, 2012 I think Nigel Clough knows what he's doing. There, I've said it. I think he knows more about football than most of us. Outrageous but true........... Uhrrr?!?! Never, Uttoxram OUT! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.