BarbadosRam
-
Posts
44 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation Activity
-
BarbadosRam got a reaction from LeedsCityRam in Keogh Sacked
I think the point is (my view of it ) is that if he had accepted the reduced wages it would have been under a completely new contract i.e. he still would have had his original contract terminated (been sacked) but reemployed on a new contract with reduced wages. Basically the club still finding him guilty of gross misconduct but accepting they want him to remain employed with the club, albeit his worth to them is much much less.
-
BarbadosRam reacted to ramit in Keogh Sacked
That's actually a rather good point. i was just playing devil's advocate, as i perceived a flaw in some of the points mentioned. If there is a court case, i hope Keogh loses it, he has not shown repentance or acceptance of doing wrong and deserves nothing at this point IMO.
-
BarbadosRam got a reaction from Rev in Keogh Sacked
I think the point is (my view of it ) is that if he had accepted the reduced wages it would have been under a completely new contract i.e. he still would have had his original contract terminated (been sacked) but reemployed on a new contract with reduced wages. Basically the club still finding him guilty of gross misconduct but accepting they want him to remain employed with the club, albeit his worth to them is much much less.
-
BarbadosRam got a reaction from ramit in Keogh Sacked
I think the point is (my view of it ) is that if he had accepted the reduced wages it would have been under a completely new contract i.e. he still would have had his original contract terminated (been sacked) but reemployed on a new contract with reduced wages. Basically the club still finding him guilty of gross misconduct but accepting they want him to remain employed with the club, albeit his worth to them is much much less.
-
-
