duncanjwitham Posted June 10, 2011 Share Posted June 10, 2011 If you were coming into the country to work on an EU passport, I guess you'd have to show that passport? Although maybe the 'I do have an Italian passport, honestly' line would have been better than using the fake one he'd got . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 10, 2011 Share Posted June 10, 2011 If you were coming into the country to work on an EU passport, I guess you'd have to show that passport? Although maybe the 'I do have an Italian passport, honestly' line would have been better than using the fake one he'd got . Rumour has it that he was actually grassed up, and they were expecting him when he returned, therefore I dont think he would have got back into this country whatever happened. He still maintains his innocence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spike1969 Posted June 11, 2011 Share Posted June 11, 2011 Daryl Murphy looks like he could be available - Celtic are apparently willing to let him go. 6' 3" tall and 28 yrs old. Not a prolific scorer by any stretch of the imagination but ticks a few boxes up top. Cost £1.5M 12 months ago. Maybe worth a punt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rampant ram Posted June 11, 2011 Share Posted June 11, 2011 would not mind riordan, but knowing derby we will sign steve brooker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leeds Ram Posted June 11, 2011 Share Posted June 11, 2011 Daryl Murphy looks like he could be available - Celtic are apparently willing to let him go. 6' 3" tall and 28 yrs old. Not a prolific scorer by any stretch of the imagination but ticks a few boxes up top. Cost £1.5M 12 months ago. Maybe worth a punt. when we need a prolific scorer who can get around 15-20 goals a season why would we buy a striker who isn't a prolific goalscorer? for me murphy aint good enough, riordon would be an interesting bet, did awful at celtic but would be interesting to see how he does down here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spike1969 Posted June 12, 2011 Share Posted June 12, 2011 when we need a prolific scorer who can get around 15-20 goals a season why would we buy a striker who isn't a prolific goalscorer? for me murphy aint good enough, riordon would be an interesting bet, did awful at celtic but would be interesting to see how he does down here. Its not a given that we need or are indeed seeking a prolific scorer who can score 15 to 20+ a season. I know that you and some others on here would love to see one but QPR won the league without having a CF featuring at the top of the scoring charts. Our best football last year came when our mobile 3 behind the man up top were scoring freely. The period with Kuqi up front never indicated that he was going to be a prolific scorer but the consensus of opinion seems to be that his deparrture was one of the triggers for our decline - his link play was important to our system. Clough may well be looking at the attributes required to be a good link man that can bring in the other players behind him and may not necessarily be that concerned about him being a proven 20 goal a season man - Hence waghorn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leeds Ram Posted June 12, 2011 Share Posted June 12, 2011 yes but then we had commons who was scoring for fun he was quite prolific if i remember right, now we don't have a commons in the team now who can do that thus we need someone in my opinion who can get the goals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davenportram Posted June 12, 2011 Share Posted June 12, 2011 If ward can maintian the form he sowed at the end of the season then he will bag us 15 goals over a season Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.