PrivateDerby Posted October 8, 2012 Share Posted October 8, 2012 The whole process of sending him to Aberystwyth Mags is pretty pointless, they're hardly gonna grant him bail are they! At least he'll get some abuse from the locals... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ladyram Posted October 8, 2012 Share Posted October 8, 2012 I just hope they find her 'http://www.dcfcfans.co.uk/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/sad' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':(' /> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PrivateDerby Posted October 8, 2012 Share Posted October 8, 2012 Same here LR, what on earth is wrong with people like him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ladyram Posted October 8, 2012 Share Posted October 8, 2012 Same here LR, what on earth is wrong with people like him? I have no idea Private, what can anybody say other than they're sick, depraved and twisted? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcsilks Posted October 8, 2012 Share Posted October 8, 2012 Let's not judge Mark Bridger until he is found guilty in a court of law. I cannot agree with the system when his name is out there for all to see and he is an innocent man unless proven otherwise. Even if he is cleared then folk will not trust him and his life will be in tatters. Let's also not judge the parents. We all have our different ways of bringing up our kids and what's right for one isn't necessarily right for another. My thoughts go out to the families of both the missing girl and the family of the accused. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Day Posted October 8, 2012 Share Posted October 8, 2012 Can't say I agree with the system either but they would of had to release pictures of him for anybody that saw him to come forward with information, Sky News interviewed a few people and he was fairly well known in the area already so his name would of come out regardless. Short off topic story, my missus saw a guy getting a good kick in by one of the local chavs outside our shop that lives across the road, turns out he ended up with a broken arm and fractured eye socket. She gave a statement and a couple months later was asked to attend court. She rang to say she couldn't make it as it was during shop hours and wants to remain anonymous anyhow as we didn't want any come back on the shop. Too late apparently, her name and our home address has already been passed onto the defence, apparently the Police should of told us this at the time which they didn't, safe to say she's been a bit jumpy now when someone knocks on the door and the court case starts this week. I can't understand why this information has to be passed on at all, I can understand how they need to verify the witness exists but surely there are better ways than passing on names and addresses to the scumbags that commit the crimes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i84est Posted October 8, 2012 Share Posted October 8, 2012 What shop have you got Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boycie Posted October 8, 2012 Share Posted October 8, 2012 I read in the news that she was allowed out later than usual due to a glowing school report, that's ok but when you look at the map and all the green directly in front of the house she could be playing on yet was allowed to play out of sight at garages near a main road..... http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/10/03/article-2211516-154F971E000005DC-345_634x422 I realise you can't wrap them up in cotton wool but 5 years old you need to be having eyes on at all times if allowed outside alone surely. if they were doctors instead of being normal working class folk, nothing would be a problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Day Posted October 8, 2012 Share Posted October 8, 2012 if they were doctors instead of being normal working class folk, nothing would be a problem. The same questions were asked tho wasn't they? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boycie Posted October 8, 2012 Share Posted October 8, 2012 The same questions were asked tho wasn't they? not by as many or down the nose. not saying you is though boss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Day Posted October 8, 2012 Share Posted October 8, 2012 not by as many or down the nose. not saying you is though boss. To be fair it's two entirely different situations, one being aloud to play quite a distance away from the house next to a road at night the other asleep in a hotel room. Maybe it's just the way I was brought up is why I can't understand it, maybe it is more common now at that age I don't know. I do have sympathy for both but at the same time "Why would you" is in my head. Times are changing I guess Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ladyram Posted October 8, 2012 Share Posted October 8, 2012 I know parents do things differently and what's right for one isn't right for another. But surely, no matter how you do it, their safety has to be priority number 1? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dangerous Posted October 9, 2012 Share Posted October 9, 2012 This is a wholly sickening case.I am afraid they will not find this little girl alive.My heart goes out to the parents but there is no way that a 5 year old child should be playing out away from the house at that time of night.When are people going to realise that the streets are not safe? Last night a man was seen exposing himself at girls near rollerworld at 7pm. It is a sick world out there and parents must keep their children safe.It isnt wrapping them in cotton wool,it is parenting.Plain and simple. I also think that Sky news coverage has been a bit too intrusive.Kay Burley has had her heart removed and replaced with a swinging brick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ladyram Posted October 9, 2012 Share Posted October 9, 2012 Kay Burley's always been the same Dangerous - I seriously don't think that that woman has got an emotion in her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PrivateDerby Posted October 9, 2012 Share Posted October 9, 2012 Didn't she inform a family member live on air?! Anyone know when he's in crown court? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansea ram Posted October 9, 2012 Share Posted October 9, 2012 He is in Crown Court tomorrow (wed). I think it is in Caernarfon, instead of Aberystwyth. Every time i see a new post on here, i hope it's the news that she's been found. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Day Posted October 9, 2012 Share Posted October 9, 2012 Didn't she inform a family member live on air?! Anyone know when he's in crown court? Wasn't a family member one of the search volunteers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansea ram Posted October 12, 2012 Share Posted October 12, 2012 It's all gone very quiet about this now. She doesn't even get mentioned on the welsh news anymore. Which is sad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ladyram Posted October 12, 2012 Share Posted October 12, 2012 I read yesterday that the man who's been charged is Aprils' older step sisters' Uncle. I so hope they find her and this doesn't end the same as that poor, poor woman who died before she managed to find her son Keith Bennet. Ian Brady's another one who should have hanged years ago, along with the evil bitch who helped him do it. B*stards. 'http://www.dcfcfans.co.uk/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/angry' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':angry:' /> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrsRam Posted October 12, 2012 Share Posted October 12, 2012 Can't say I agree with the system either but they would of had to release pictures of him for anybody that saw him to come forward with information, Sky News interviewed a few people and he was fairly well known in the area already so his name would of come out regardless. Short off topic story, my missus saw a guy getting a good kick in by one of the local chavs outside our shop that lives across the road, turns out he ended up with a broken arm and fractured eye socket. She gave a statement and a couple months later was asked to attend court. She rang to say she couldn't make it as it was during shop hours and wants to remain anonymous anyhow as we didn't want any come back on the shop. Too late apparently, her name and our home address has already been passed onto the defence, apparently the Police should of told us this at the time which they didn't, safe to say she's been a bit jumpy now when someone knocks on the door and the court case starts this week. I can't understand why this information has to be passed on at all, I can understand how they need to verify the witness exists but surely there are better ways than passing on names and addresses to the scumbags that commit the crimes. I didn't see this till just - the defence have her name, but the defendant will not know it. If she's feeling vulnerable or intimidated, she can apply for special measures, just get in touch with Witness Care - then when she's at court, she will be looked after by Witness Service. She can have screens round her and sometimes people can give evidence via video link. If she gets any intimidation whatsoever, she should contact the police immediately. Your 'missus' is doing her bit for society and I know it can be a pain and frightening but she's doing the right thing and it's a shame that sometimes the justice system doesn't understand what it means to give evidence. I hope she gets looked after properly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.