Jump to content

TibshelfRam

Member
  • Content Count

    393
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About TibshelfRam

  • Rank
    Member
  • Birthday 25/12/1992

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Tibshelf, Derbyshire

Season Ticket Holder

  • Season Ticket
    South Lower - Block D

Recent Profile Visitors

844 profile views
  1. Bogle is out until after the international break https://www.derbytelegraph.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/Derby-county-boss-phillip-cocu-3240296
  2. I'd go with: ------------------Roos Jozefzoon--Keogh--Clarke--Lowe ------------------Bielik ------------Knight-----Dowell Paterson----------------- Lawrence ------------------Waghorn Really tough game. WBA are my favourites for promotion - I think that they've got a really strong squad, pace, power and a genuine threat. Bilic is a top drawer coach and they've done well to get him at this level. Will be really tough. Bold selection choice. Don't see 3 at the back as the long term answer, more of an alternative formation. Marriott isn't going to start as he's not 100%. In a 4-3-3/4-2-3-1 he needs to provide more link up play so would go with Waghorn. Jozefzoon at RB would be my bold shout. Just think we look so much better with a genuine attacking presence wide right. Lowe's left foot doesn't provide that. Malone doesn't look great whereas Lowe is a top quality player. Get him into his favoured position instead of weakening both full back slots. We haven't clicked yet because the personnel haven't been right. Waghorn NEEDS more players around him. Bielik is such quality that we don't need to play 2xDMs. Get Knight in for his energy and creativity. With two creative midfielders, we will look better. Dowell has been carrying the creative burden of this team so hasn't thrived yet. Huddlestone is too slow. Get more bodies around Waghorn and he'll come good. Lawrence will also get more service with more creative players involved. Would go with Holmes in the middle instead of Knight but he is playing for the U23s today so won't feature. We will look a much better side with Bogle and Holmes in, Bielik up to speed and Marriott coming back. Cocu will go with: Roos; Lowe, Keogh, Clarke, Malone; Huddlestone, Evans; Paterson, Dowell, Lawrence; Waghorn Don't think he expected to need Bielik to play 90 mid week and he won't consider him ready for Saturday. Still think he reckons we need the protection of 2xDMs, especially against a good WBA side. Think he feels he has no option but to go with Lowe at RB and Malone at LB. I'm hoping that a defeat mid week followed by a high intensity match against a decent side might be what is needed. Gives us a kick up the back side and I expect a better performance, if not a result, tomorrow. Should be a good match.
  3. My take aways from last night: - No need to panic. 42 games left. We are always going to lose some games. Cocu is still getting to grips with his best side, the new players are still getting to grips with the style and system etc. A loss might not be a bad thing if it enables us to kick start the season. - With Bogle to come back, with Bielik to get to full fitness, with Holmes to come back in and with Marriott to get to 100% we start to look a much better side. - Bristol City looked decent. I think they'll challenge for top 6. Very solid and well organised - we really struggled to penetrate. With Afobe and Weimann up top they are dangerous on the break and will cause teams problems. - We weren't THAT bad. We actually created a few nice bits and some of our movement was better. I actually thought that, going forward, we had improved slightly on previous games. And were in not for a couple of mindless individual errors, we weren't caused too many problems. Tactics - One major positive is that we have tactical flexibility - something that we've perhaps needed for some time. Long term, I still think that 4-3-3/4-2-3-1 is the way for us to go, but knowing that we have the players to play with a 3-4-1-2 gives us another option and Cocu seems happy to use it. - Even if we play a 4-3-3, at times it can become a 3 at the back just naturally and organically. If Bielik sits in front of the back 4, he can drop in as we attack and allow the full backs to bomb on, even Keogh to move forward and get Lawrence more centrally. Which means that... - ...we get too bogged down in formations on here. What I can see from Cocu's style is that we are a much more fluid team positionally. Our formation is largely redundant and players will drop in and provide where it is needed. If we line up 4-3-3, it does not mean that we are going to play that rigidly for 90 minutes. Players - Bogle is a huge miss. We lack so much of an attacking threat from out wide without him. Lowe is doing an admirable job out there but he doesn't give us the same. He looked better when moved out left and we looked better when Zoon gave us some width out there. - Malone is a player that I have defended on a number of occasions, but I do think that the time is coming to move him out of the first team. Nothing against him, I just feel that Lowe's spell in Scotland and his exposure to the first team has matured him and he should be our first choice left back moving forward once Bogle returns. I just think he's a better option and with Bogle and Lowe on either side, we look dangerous. - After a slightly shaky start, Bielik showed his worth. He's a rolls royce player. Able to find a pass superbly and always in control defensively. Will be a huge asset for us moving forwards as we've missed a player like him for years. Felt he was wasted in a back 3, personally. Once it became apparent that Bristol City were not going to attack and would sit in second half, I'd have put Huddlestone into the back 3, and moved Bielik into the middle - he was always looking to move it forwards and would have given us more bite in the middle when we needed to win it back quickly to build an attack. - Huddlestone is not what we need in a game like that. I think he still has a role to play but not last night. Bristol City were sitting back and allowing us the ball - Huddlestone doesn't know what to do in that situation as he just slows the game down so much. For me, he only plays when we are away from home and are going to be up against it as he can put his foot on it and control the game. We need a more mobile option in the middle last night - we needed a box to box player to play in there (Holmes may be that man moving forwards) as that would complement Bielik and Dowell. In a game like last night, and with the quality Bielik has, we have no need to play 2xDMs. - Jozefzoon is unfairly scapegoated. His final ball wasn't always great but the overreaction amongst fans was too much. It was almost like they were waiting for him to fail. I actually felt he did okay after coming on and gave us some much needed width on the right. - Bennett is lost on me. I just don't see what he provides. He has to be an impact sub, not technically good enough to start. - Lawrence looked brighter and got more involved. Should've scored. Should've had more decisions given his way. - Waghorn needs players closer to him - so isolated, especially against a back 3. Highlights why we didn't need 2xDMs. A box to box player solves that. - Marriott is a quality goalscorer. But I don't agree with all the 'he has to start' stuff. In that first half, what difference would he actually have made? We didn't create enough chances. We saw so many games like that last season where he was invisible. We need to create more if Marriott starts as he's not a striker who brings others into the game. As it stands, I have no problem with bringing him off the bench to give us something different. May well start v West Brom as I'd expect a more open game where he may be able to get chances. THAT SAID, he is clearly a striker with enormous quality and I would love to see him start. But we need to be creating more chances and not isolating our striker for that to happen. - Holmes can't come back soon enough. He's exactly what we're missing - the energetic box to box player in the middle. we so missed that last night. - Roos doesn't fill me with confidence. The ref Absolutely abysmal performance. Some strange decisions which absolutely affected how we played. every time we were in the ascendancy, we were penalised. West Brom Could actually be just what we need - a team who will likely come at us more and there may be more space for us to create chances. If we can grab a win, on TV, against promotion favourites, last night is forgotten. We seem to struggle against teams who just want to sit back and absorb pressure - I'd be surprised to see a Slaven Bilic side play that way. Would bring in Knight for Huddlestone for greater energy in midfield and would go with Paterson ahead of Bennett wide right. 4-3-3. Still think that it has been a solid start to the season. Encouraged by what Cocu had to say after the game and the changes he made in game. Still positive about the season ahead. I think that some fans need to put the start into perspective.
  4. Essentially, its an incredibly expensive, incredibly long commercial advert for Leeds United Football Club. Its a PR exercise, and I can't knock them for wanting them to exploit it. But you can tell, within minute one, that it was dreamed up by the club and not initially by a tv company. It doesn't have the neutrality of the Sunderland one - it is just a party political broadcast on behalf of the Leeds United party. And even they couldn't airbrush out the final chapter.
  5. This is true. And I'm definitely not a paid up member of the King Billy fan club (far from it). But I don't imagine that he'd have done worse than Jewell. Things were royally screwed up from top to bottom so neither would've achieved much. But maybe we'd have had a point or two more under Billy. Certainly no fewer, that's for sure.
  6. That, and probably recognising that they would both be liabilities on yellow cards so was not wanting to take the chance of things escalating.
  7. Hull away. He looked good. Plus, I actually felt that when he came on in the play off final, we looked better - direct running and stayed wide causing them problems. Football is a game of opinions, mind. Take your point about Lawrence. Which is why I said about the other wingers Cocu has worked with. Plenty would say that Depay and Lozano have been 1 in 4 wingers at other clubs. But Cocu got the best out of the them in a system that suited them. I say, lets give him the chance to do it again. Because if he can, Lawrence could be one hell of a player.
  8. Oh, what high standards we aspire to, eh Sage?
  9. Have you been sponsored by a well known online casino company?
  10. Because, of course, none of the callers are idiots, are they? 👀 I've often believed (contrary to the entire purpose of this forum) that the world would be a much simpler place were it not for involvement from the general public who, more often than not, are idiots. Present company very much included 😂
  11. I know that this is perhaps controversial, but I actually am. And I'll remain so for a while yet until they convince me otherwise. Lawrence has always had it in him to be a quality player. I always felt that Rowett-ball never suited him and that he was a bit in out out of the side due to injuries last season. I really feel that Cocu's system suits him and allows him to play his natural game. Once we click going forward with a little more creativity to supply the wingers he'll start firing. Look at every side Cocu has managed, from Depay to Lozano - he's had an inconsistent inside forward who has thrived in his system and under his management. Jozefzoon is a decent opposite number to Lawrence - as Lawrence wants to come inside, Jozefzoon can stay wide and pin the touchline. I personally think that he's trying to hard at the moment due to criticism - he needs to just play his game. He's at his best when he's asked to just run at players and stretch teams with his pace. There's a player in there and in the system we are going with, he could be effective. Paterson could be a mixture of the two but, whilst some people will say he's never pulled up any trees, I'd say that he's been a first team regular at championship sides for a while and has been a solid performer. He wouldn't be my first choice, but he's a decent back up who can play anywhere across the front 3. What I'm saying is this: would I have complained if we'd have brought in top draw wingers from elsewhere? Of course not. But I actually think that we have wingers who, in the right system and given the right service (which thus far they haven't been) are more than able to do well. I think that that will come and things will click into place going forward. And I believe that we have a system that will get the best out of them.
  12. What was that? Speak up man, I can't hear you. I've got my ear muffs on in anticipation.
  13. I can give you a 749 slide powerpoint presentation to counter your argument, can't I, Marcelo?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.