vicky-27 Posted September 3, 2009 Share Posted September 3, 2009 Wolverhampton Wanderers chief executive Jez Moxey has revealed Sam Vokes' proposed loan move to Derby County fell through late on transfer deadline day. The Premier League side had agreed a deal with the Rams following the arrival of Austrian striker Stefan Maierhoferhttp://static.lingospot.com/spot/image/spacer from Rapid Vienna. Derby were keen to bring in Wales international Vokeshttp://static.lingospot.com/spot/image/spacer after agreeing to sell Rob Hulsehttp://static.lingospot.com/spot/image/spacer to Middlesbrough. But Hulse's move to Boro collapsed, meaning that Vokes' proposed loan switch also fell through at the last minute. "We weren't going to let Sam go unless we signed Stefan Maierhofer," Moxey said in the Birmingham Mail. "Once that was done, we agreed a deal for Derby to take Sam for the season. HHmmmm so is someone telling porkies then - Adam Pearson said they all sat down round the table - him, Hulse and Nigel and all agreed he should stay :confused: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thornhill Posted September 3, 2009 Share Posted September 3, 2009 The clean and decent version is that they accepted the bid for Hulse on the terms that he could go if he wanted, and then prepared Vokes as back-up just incase he decided to leave. Obviously the other version is that the board accepted the bid and then wanted a cheap Loan in as a replacement. Take your pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derbydan Posted September 3, 2009 Share Posted September 3, 2009 [url=http://www.dcfcfans.uk/showthread.php?t=2062]http://www.dcfcfans.uk/showthread.php?t=2062 [url=http://www.dcfcfans.uk/showthread.php?t=2060]http://www.dcfcfans.uk/showthread.php?t=2060 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vicky-27 Posted September 3, 2009 Author Share Posted September 3, 2009 /ohmy:o:o:D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rodders Posted September 3, 2009 Share Posted September 3, 2009 why didnt we just sign him as back up ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CumbrianRam Posted September 4, 2009 Share Posted September 4, 2009 Originally posted by rodney ram;31270 why didnt we just sign him as back up ? Agreed, would rather have him that Dickov. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mushram Posted September 4, 2009 Share Posted September 4, 2009 He looked decent last season, why not sign him anyways? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derbydan Posted September 4, 2009 Share Posted September 4, 2009 perhaps want to play first team football and as it says if you read it back nige can't guarantee that from this report- [url=http://www.expressandstar.com/2009/09/02/vokes-loan-deal-ran-out-of-time/]http://www.expressandstar.com/2009/09/02/v...an-out-of-time/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boycie Posted September 4, 2009 Share Posted September 4, 2009 We dunna need him, we got super sub nobov. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.