RamsDerby

Did this letter represent everyone's views? Nah. It didn't represent mine. But if you honestly don't think that letter gave the club a kick up the arse to open communication back up with not only individual fans, but groups previously in communication with them, then I don't know what to say. 
Maybe I could shout 'super fan' etc at people who support Derby and have major concerns. The poll that was done showed the letter actually contained wholly or mostly concerns from the majority of the fan base. 
Was it really that hard for the club to release a statement at the end of the season to state they are waiting for government decisions before releasing season ticket information? 
Was it really that hard for the club to start realising maybe these meetings with supporters could be done virtually and they should have still been doing them over the last 6 months?
There is nothing in the letter that I couldn't have written, that's not the point. Fans, and I can't be alone on this, were getting concerned at the complete blackout of communication. We went from Mel turning up to your local pub to going on Talksport to duck all. If Mel is unwell and unable to perform these duties, then there really should be someone put in place who can. 
It seems this club has taken advantage of the fact we cannot attend games or supporters meetings. That is from the players right up to the boardroom. The entire performance of this club over the last 12 months has been amateur. 
I also find it nice to hear that there are potential, 'credible' investors in conversation with us. Because officially, we didn't know. Just rumours from journalists. It's actually eased my worries that the lack of communication was based on a lack of interest in the purchasing of the club and we were in deep poo. Maybe we still are.

I joined a few days ago, as I wanted to join an official group. They are a registered , formal supporters trust which has a couple of membership options, including full membership with a share in the trust, for £2. I personally had not seen them as being as an active group for some time and not been as active as they can and should be. 
 

Great questions to be fair and why I personally chose to decline the invitation to co sign, reading the replies has justified my position.
I'm not sure how the supporter groups handle this issue of speaking on behalf of their members, be it votes, meetings or what and to be honest it is't any of my business either. 
The way I look at it is if you are a Labour member, vote Labour, this doesn't mean you agree with every point on their manifesto. You simply agree with what they are trying to achieve.
We're never going to agree on every aspect of the club from pitch to boardroom, 1 day on this forum will show that, but why knock others for having different opinions, strong opinions that they felt the need to act? 
Having read the letter and despite not signing it, I never felt once that they were trying in anyway speaking on behalf of myself personally, which the topic is getting lost in and the "who do they think they are". They are Derby fans. 
Would it not be a far better discussion if it focused on the points in the letter and why you agree or disagree, the forum is a platform designed to hold discussions, was never intended as a battle base to throw stones at other supporter groups or fans from other platforms.