Perky1106 Posted November 27, 2009 Share Posted November 27, 2009 Back the bid if you want to see the World Cup in Derby. http://www.derby2018bid.com/ We're competing amongst another 15 cities including Leicester and Nottingham. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u41LQf4T1gQ&feature=related Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrOrdinary Posted December 16, 2009 Share Posted December 16, 2009 didnt get it, bad times forest seem to have won the east midlands vote, gash mk dons, plymouth and bristol all ahead of us?!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CumbrianRam Posted December 16, 2009 Share Posted December 16, 2009 Milton Keynes, Plymouth, Bristol WTF? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perky1106 Posted December 16, 2009 Author Share Posted December 16, 2009 An absolute disgrace imo. Having three in London! And two in Manchester! Then picking four cities that each have stadiums smaller than hours and will require things such as new builds, planning permission and all that. I hope we don't get the world cup now. England doesn't deserve it if its committee can't make the most logical of decisions. Though I'm not at all surprised. Just like usual they have to put ******* London at the centre of everything and that tinpot commuter town nearby (basically so that four stadiums are in London as if they're not getting enough new sporting developments there already) . I bet they didn't even read the documents about Derby's bid or consider it whatsoever. *****. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CumbrianRam Posted December 16, 2009 Share Posted December 16, 2009 Plymouth are skint aren't they? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrOrdinary Posted December 16, 2009 Share Posted December 16, 2009 honestly watching it now, i cant help but think, lord mawhinney doesnt know what hes talking about, mk dons, itll be an empty stadium week in week out forest, well no planning permission, the local council against the plan and if they were truely spreading it around the coountry surely east anglia is missing a city too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perky1106 Posted December 16, 2009 Author Share Posted December 16, 2009 Plymouth are skint aren't they? They're skint, don't have many fans and are heading for League One. The city is a port with an enormous council estate round it. It's an excellent city for the world cup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrOrdinary Posted December 16, 2009 Share Posted December 16, 2009 Plymouth are skint aren't they? thats what i thought too, i mean they cant even afford new players Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perky1106 Posted December 16, 2009 Author Share Posted December 16, 2009 honestly watching it now, i cant help but think, lord mawhinney doesnt know what hes talking about, mk dons, itll be an empty stadium week in week out forest, well no planning permission, the local council against the plan and if they were truely spreading it around the coountry surely east anglia is missing a city too? England's definition of "spreading round the country" is making sure there are four stadiums in London because of course the rest of England doesn't matter does it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrOrdinary Posted December 16, 2009 Share Posted December 16, 2009 nah of course it doesnt i mean where would the football league be with out the midlands and the north well knowhere really, look at all the southern and london clubs in the first ever league...Accrington, Aston Villa, Blackburn Rovers, Bolton Wanderers, Burnley, Derby County, Everton, Notts County, Preston North End, Stoke City, West Bromwich Albion and Wolverhampton Wanderers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derbydan Posted December 16, 2009 Share Posted December 16, 2009 what a feckin joke!! that is all :mad: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perky1106 Posted December 16, 2009 Author Share Posted December 16, 2009 It just makes me angry that they don't consider the significance of football in the north and the midlands and are trying to make London the centre of football just because it's the capital. Then adding a few more southern towns where the passion just isn't the same as it is in somewhere like Derby, Stoke or Blackburn. The MK bid seemed to be getting a lot of media attention and I'm not surprised they've got it. I reckon Wankelmen's doing some dodgy dealings with the FA behind closed doors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dangerous Posted December 16, 2009 Share Posted December 16, 2009 ridiculous.what have milton keynes got? Why pick a stadium that hasnt been built in scum city over Derby and leicesters excellent stadia?The FA have proven theyre run by baffoons who know nothing about football Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rodders Posted December 16, 2009 Share Posted December 16, 2009 wgo got it :@:mad: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derbydan Posted December 16, 2009 Share Posted December 16, 2009 wgo got it :@:mad: i don't understand any of that mate u bin on the ciders again lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rodders Posted December 16, 2009 Share Posted December 16, 2009 who got it ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derbydan Posted December 16, 2009 Share Posted December 16, 2009 who got it ? ah rite sorry pal- The 12 Cities are Birmingham Bristol Leeds Liverpool London Manchester Milton Keynes Newcastle/Gateshead Nottingham Plymouth Sheffield Sunderland Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rodders Posted December 16, 2009 Share Posted December 16, 2009 where the ******* hell are derby :mad: plymouth ******* plymouth are you seriouse the ******* green army get it !!!!!!!!!11111 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Day Posted December 16, 2009 Share Posted December 16, 2009 Forest got it, get in there!!! 50,000 seater stadium that they will only be able to half fill in the big games mwhahahahaha. Nottingham Road cemetery will have a better atmosphere, hell even Boros ground will be rocking compared to their new ground. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Day Posted December 16, 2009 Share Posted December 16, 2009 Also don't forget this isnt the final list, IF England wins the bid Fifa then decides which venues will be used. I think it's 3 will be dropped from that list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.