Day Posted March 12, 2009 Share Posted March 12, 2009 [url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1161302/Gold-reserves-Sportsmails-guide-expensive-second-teamers-football.html]http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/...s-football.html Robbie Savage is on there, why??? I'm sure I can think of more expensive flops who have played less games than £1.5m Savage! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thornhill Posted March 12, 2009 Share Posted March 12, 2009 "Maybe not the most expensive in terms of transfer fee, but Savage was earning enough from the club to flaunt a £160,000 Mercedes at the training ground following his banishment to the 'stiffs' by former manager Paul Jewell." be bought that the same week he moved, didn't he? with most of his money for Blackburn? idiots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Day Posted March 13, 2009 Author Share Posted March 13, 2009 To be honest what did you expect from the Daily Mail? Any chance to take a pop at Derby County and they will. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattyTheRam Posted March 13, 2009 Share Posted March 13, 2009 Well im glad im not the person who has to break the news to him! looks like he could seriously hurt ya lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCFC..Jason Posted March 13, 2009 Share Posted March 13, 2009 THe Daily Mail Is Made Up Of People Who Love To Judge & Feel They Are Great Journalists Despite Having No Experience In Football (At Least Modern Day Football) VERON .. SHEVCHENKO For Example Were Bigger Flops .. And Alan Smith At Newcastle I Remember An Article Picking On Savage A Few Months Back, Because He Has An Armani Logo Tattoo ... And They Couldnt Accept He Could Change Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perky1106 Posted March 13, 2009 Share Posted March 13, 2009 I actually think the Daily Mail is worse than The Sun and The Mirror. Not just for its poor sports journalism, that demonstrates a severe lack of knowledge. It has an outright political bias and many articles and reviews are poorly written. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.