Pearson Posted March 9, 2012 Share Posted March 9, 2012 I would. Bavies to RM. Ward in for Bryson. Bailey for Carroll. All opinions I know, but Bailey's distribution is poor in comparison to Carroll. I appreciate he is lightweight and easily knocked of the ball but his retention is superior and that is a key ingredient in a successful side. Give the ball away and you will not figure in a Clough side. Retention and good ball distribution are the fundamentals of a winning side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramarena Posted March 11, 2012 Share Posted March 11, 2012 All opinions I know, but Bailey's distribution is poor in comparison to Carroll. I appreciate he is lightweight and easily knocked of the ball but his retention is superior and that is a key ingredient in a successful side. Give the ball away and you will not figure in a Clough side. Retention and good ball distribution are the fundamentals of a winning side. You would think that if retention and good ball distribution were fundamentals that Clough insisted on, then we would not play hoofball half the time. One of the major culprits with poor distribution is Barker. Even Jake Buxton's distribution was better than Barkers yesterday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.