G STAR RAM Posted February 27, 2012 Share Posted February 27, 2012 Isn't the whole point rather the opposite of that? If a tight FFP system was ever (and I doubt it ever will) fully introduced limiting spending to 55% of turnover, then the club wouldn't be able to bring in a new striker as they wouldn not be allowed to spend any more money. In that case, the 'richness' of the owners is irrelevant, so the fans might as well own the club. Not read the proposed rules but I imagine the expenditure will relate to revenue items (wages, overheads etc) rather than capital expenditure (transfer fees) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
p.shilton Posted February 27, 2012 Share Posted February 27, 2012 So under the idea proposed that could mean you having to stump up more money during the season, assume you would be ok with that? Nope, just saying that things wouldn't be any different in that department Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.