Day Posted December 31, 2011 Share Posted December 31, 2011 @henrywinter Commission: “We have found Mr Suarez used the word "negro" or "negros" 7 times in his exchanges with Mr Evra”. Considered bigger suspension Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GboroRam Posted January 1, 2012 Share Posted January 1, 2012 I nominate you to read that over the weekend and get back to us on Monday and give us a shortened guilty or not guilty verdict Basically Suarez' changed his evidence several times from start to finish, and wasn't particularly believable in what he was saying. He says he was using the word "negro" in a conciliatory and/or friendly way, but he was fairly clearly trying to wind Evra up. Some of the conversation Suarez alleges happens doesn't make sense (that he used the word in response to Evra saying "don't touch me" after Suarez pinches his arm; he says he said "I can't touch you because you're black?" - but Evra didn't notice the pinch so likely wouldn't have said it) and it's in response to challenges like that that made his evidence less credible than Evra's. All in all, not great reading for Suarez. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leeds Ram Posted January 1, 2012 Share Posted January 1, 2012 It's a shame liverpool backed a liar, not surprised though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boycie Posted January 1, 2012 Share Posted January 1, 2012 Self pity city? Never. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-JW- Posted January 1, 2012 Share Posted January 1, 2012 JT case must be out soon?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcsilks Posted January 4, 2012 Share Posted January 4, 2012 If Liverpool are not appealing then why are they still backing the player? http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/blogs/early-doors/liverpool-suarez-stance-shames-great-club-083753446.html The players run the clubs nowadays. Player power is as big as it has ever been and basically, Liverpool are scared stiff to do anything other than to back their star asset. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alph Posted January 4, 2012 Share Posted January 4, 2012 If Liverpool are not appealing then why are they still backing the player? [url=http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/blogs/early-doors/liverpool-suarez-stance-shames-great-club-083753446.html]http://uk.eurosport....-083753446.html Simply because Kenny "the football God" Daglish is actually a tw*t. He can do and say and behave however he wants. He used to be a good player you know? Who needs manners and principals when your a football legend? Why, he should be rewarded with a slave from Gambia. Simple, if your good at football then your to be respected as a human being no matter how rude you are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rynny Posted January 5, 2012 Share Posted January 5, 2012 Think this sums up liverpool perfectly http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/16424487.stm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
froggg Posted January 5, 2012 Share Posted January 5, 2012 What an embarrassment Liverpool I cannot believe a club of Liverpool's stature, with how it has previously led on matters of social injustice and inequality, can allow its integrity and credibility to be debased by such crass and ill-considered responses Lord Ouseley Chairman, Kick It Out anti-racism campaign Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ladyram Posted January 5, 2012 Share Posted January 5, 2012 Utterly stupid of Liverpool to even consider wearing those t shirts. They may support him (and they really must think this issue is a non event 'http://www.dcfcfans.co.uk/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/ohmy' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':o' /> ) but I believe they're wrong to advertise the fact. What kind of message does that send out, other than "Kick it out but not at our club"? I don't see what they're trying to achieve and I'm surprised at Daglish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TommyLad Posted January 6, 2012 Share Posted January 6, 2012 Seems odd, at first I was disgusted at the length of the ban but after hearing he put forward bugger all evidence and there were apparently a couple of Lpool players testifying that he said something along those lines, its hard not to be disappointed in the team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leeds Ram Posted January 7, 2012 Share Posted January 7, 2012 Not only did he put forward no evidence, his "evidence" was inconsistant and incoherent, which makes Dalgliesh backing him even worse. I cannot stand the pair of them, Liverpool are in 6th, let us hope they can sink even lower. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.