tomsdubs Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 "Championship trio Hull City, Derby and Portsmouth are all thought to be keen on Taylor-Fletcher and they are monitoring his contract situation at Blackpool." http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11688_7044964,00.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roofio Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 That'd be good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hucknall Ram Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 Hummmm, not so sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomsdubs Posted July 17, 2011 Author Share Posted July 17, 2011 Was very good for them in the prem, personally i think he'd be quality for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hucknall Ram Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 Just think he a player that will only be good for them, much rather try and get Matty Phillips Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anag Ram Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 He's very underrated. Looks slow but thinks fast. Clever player. Would interact well with our other forwards. Think Waghorn's now a non-starter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brett Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 would be an okay signing, would rather spend the money on waghorn but that deal is looking off now imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RotherhamRam Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 would be an okay signing, would rather spend the money on waghorn but that deal is looking off now imo. Leicester will do a Ranger and Celtic in the 1990s have players who will not be first choice within the club so other clubs do not benefit. They have owners who are happy to throw money into the club and do not need to sell therefore someone like Waghorn whether likes it or not will warm their bench whhen they bring loan strikers in like the lad from everton. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastKentRam Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 Dont see the point, works hard but doesnt offer much quality. A lot of these Blackpool players will have over inflated prices after their season in the Prem, they performed well as a team but when it comes down to it, a lot of them have been scraping around in the Championship/League 1 for most of their career and that's about their level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rams71 Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 Dont see the point, works hard but doesnt offer much quality. A lot of these Blackpool players will have over inflated prices after their season in the Prem, they performed well as a team but when it comes down to it, a lot of them have been scraping around in the Championship/League 1 for most of their career and that's about their level. i agree mate,he's nowt special Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walsall_Ram Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 Firstly.. GTF is not a striker. More so a right midfielder/winger aka Lee Croft. Wages will be 10k plus big bonus, promotion. He'd only want a year contract, 2 at max. Wouldn't mind him though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIMBAUD Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 Do you think that RM is a position we have covered in some depth? Croft, green, davis, doyle, war, cywka? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alph Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 Had we not brought Maguire and Tyson in. And had Clough not said after the Burton game that perhaps Bryson is more suited to the attacking midfield than the anchor role, then i'd be pretty happy to get this tidy Championship footballer. But Ward, Cywka, Green, Tyson, B Davies, Maguire, Bryson, Pearson, Martin, S Davies....... how many different options can we give ourselves in the attacking department. No need for Taylor Fletcher when there are far more important areas in the team that could do with the same sort of depth. Having said that, it would be an ok signing if it happened. Adds more depth i suppose. Decent player. Papers seem to be linking us with everyone now that they see we're active in the market. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srg Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 Don't want him, don't think we do either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIMBAUD Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 I think you're right on all counts. Both full back positions and a good old fashioned ball winner in midfield would be key acquisitions in my book. (And a decent target man.) In all fairness i'm sure NC and his staff think in a similar way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
p.shilton Posted July 17, 2011 Share Posted July 17, 2011 Do you think that RM is a position we have covered in some depth? Croft, green, davis, doyle, war, cywka? Now that's a scary name- should be a CB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Posted July 18, 2011 Share Posted July 18, 2011 The Yanks are at it again, do you realise how much it would cost for Taylor-Fletcher on the back of your shirt? they would probably give him the 999 shirt number as well the robbing gits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uttoxram75 Posted July 18, 2011 Share Posted July 18, 2011 The Yanks are at it again, do you realise how much it would cost for Taylor-Fletcher on the back of your shirt? they would probably give him the 999 shirt number as well the robbing gits. Just have [sIZE=4]GTF[/sIZE] IN huge letters on yer shirt................. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davenportram Posted July 18, 2011 Share Posted July 18, 2011 The next cost saving measure from the club will be to shorten players names on the back if match shirts L'cock Bye'r And if we do sign him the rather Chavvy T-Fletch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perky1106 Posted July 18, 2011 Share Posted July 18, 2011 L'cock That abbreviation might be misinterpreted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.