NorfolkRam Posted March 6, 2011 Share Posted March 6, 2011 It's not that he plays for Forest, it's what he has does while he was there. I would take Tudgay back right now, difference between the two is that Tudgay conducts himself with a bit of class Plus tudgay is a natural finisher and Tyson isn't. Tudgay would be a going addition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davenportram Posted March 6, 2011 Share Posted March 6, 2011 Lets look at what he would bring to the club experienced Championship playerContract runs out in the summerWont cost anythingruns around a lot Sounds perfect for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roofio Posted March 6, 2011 Share Posted March 6, 2011 'A somewhat humorous misfortune has followed Tyson during his spells at various football clubs, although not directly affecting him. Alan Pardew departed as Reading manager shortly after his arrival at the club, and the departures of John Hollins (Swansea City) and Tony Adams (Wycombe) came soon after his arrival at the respective clubs. Gary Megson departed Nottingham Forest in the month following Tyson's permanent move to The City Ground. Tyson laughed off suggestions of a curse in an interview after Nottingham Forest's victory at Port Vale'. Get him in!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hintonsboots Posted March 6, 2011 Share Posted March 6, 2011 What would be the point of signing Tyson? Robinson is fast, Pearson is fast. Tyson has zero end product and we are playing hoof ball. What chance has Tyson got when the ball is. In the air against a 6 foot 4 CB? We dont want another player with zero end product, we already have Mr Pearson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G STAR RAM Posted March 6, 2011 Share Posted March 6, 2011 What would be the point of signing Tyson? Robinson is fast, Pearson is fast. Tyson has zero end product and we are playing hoof ball. What chance has Tyson got when the ball is. In the air against a 6 foot 4 CB? Robinson is fast? I had heard that rumour too. He couldn't even outrun Paul McShane yesterday! Not really season Tyson play much but he absolutely roasted Leacock at the city ground and set up 2 of their goals I think, that is more end product than I have seen from Ben Davies so far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sage Posted March 6, 2011 Share Posted March 6, 2011 From what I have heard he only ever plays well against us. Not much use to us really. He would look good in training then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RotherhamRam Posted March 6, 2011 Share Posted March 6, 2011 Bloody hope not, we have enough runners with no end product. Robert Earnshaw brought by Silly Davis for soft money. Played no real part of the Premiership year. Went to Forest for silly money took the pish out of them for spending their money on crap and he has scored goals for them and against us since moving and we have egg on our faces. Tudgay another one and Lee Camp. At the time they left us we felt nothing at their moves but seen the tramp Camp in tights turn into a keeper we regret losing, Tudgay still don't rate him highly but would have him back, and earnshaw scores goals jjust a tosser. Would it not be nice to have a player come from them NOT rated and shove the flag up thier harris instead of ours. He has pace and can set up. He has better control than Robinson so yes I would have him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boycie Posted March 6, 2011 Share Posted March 6, 2011 Everyone's missed the McGugan Pearson swap rumour? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ambitious Posted March 6, 2011 Share Posted March 6, 2011 Out of contract at the end of the season, more frustrating than stephen pearson.. effective and useless in equal measures. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RamNut Posted March 6, 2011 Share Posted March 6, 2011 Everyone's missed the McGugan Pearson swap rumour? nice try Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boycie Posted March 6, 2011 Share Posted March 6, 2011 nice try What? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muzza Posted March 7, 2011 Share Posted March 7, 2011 i would like to see nathan come to derby, would be a excellent signing by nigel, but alas one hs to dream, especially with this debt we have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ambitious Posted March 7, 2011 Share Posted March 7, 2011 i would like to see nathan come to derby, would be a excellent signing by nigel, but alas one hs to dream, especially with this debt we have. Debt? Dream? Do I detect a wum? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muzza Posted March 7, 2011 Share Posted March 7, 2011 Debt? Dream? Do I detect a wum? no of course not, ambitious, im a life long derby fan, you gotta think realistically. will Glick get us out of debt? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcfcdavecov Posted March 7, 2011 Share Posted March 7, 2011 no of course not, ambitious, im a life long derby fan, you gotta think realistically. will Glick get us out of debt? Muzza, ya shudda, coulda probably woulda known that we only owe the mortgage on PP.......... if you wasn't a forest wumma. And Tyson is a flag wielding bumma. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ambitious Posted March 7, 2011 Share Posted March 7, 2011 no of course not, ambitious, im a life long derby fan, you gotta think realistically. will Glick get us out of debt? I am guessing either you are a wum or very VERY poorly informed, Glick doesn't put any money in whatsoever, it's not his job to.. that was your first mistake, the fact we aren't in debt anymore.. well apart from the mortage of course.. the clubs financial state is very healthy, probably one of the best in the country! that was your second mistake. Your 3rd mistake was obviously calling a player who scores a goal every 6/7 games a 'dream'.. as I've previously said, he is effective and useless in equal measures. I'm guessin he annoys opposition managers because he is a player that you have to build your game plan around because of his pace, however 99/100 shots/crosses/passes go absolutely nowhere near the intended target, several forest fans have said this.. however on a free I wouldn't mind him because he does bring something different as I've previously said however anything more than 4/5k a week he can go sing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boycie Posted March 7, 2011 Share Posted March 7, 2011 no of course not, ambitious, im a life long derby fan, you gotta think realistically. will Glick get us out of debt? Cause he will, then we'll get some investment from the investment group, who will want their money back in time (debt) so we'll be in debt again. Ah well, could be worse. They not done economics at school yet mate? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HAZ Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 Everyone's missed the McGugan Pearson swap rumour? Would love that! Never in a million years though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kinder bueno Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 Well this is aload of sh** because why would a player like tyson come to a rival???? just like waghorn from leicester he didnt want to come,this thread is just useless information. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boycie Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 We had a Player called Commons once you know, have a look where he came from. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.