Gaspode Posted August 26, 2021 Share Posted August 26, 2021 Obviously no need to warn people to watch what they reply - Manchester City footballer Benjamin Mendy charged with four counts of rape and one count of sexual assault: https://t.co/bILc4wLdRZ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyler Durden Posted August 26, 2021 Share Posted August 26, 2021 Like the way the club say he's being suspended pending an investigation....not like he would be able to play for them or anything if he's been remanded in custody... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pearl Ram Posted August 26, 2021 Share Posted August 26, 2021 Just seen this on the Sky News ticker thing at the bottom of the screen. Not going to comment because I don’t know the facts however I do wonder if people charged on this kind of thing should remain anonymous until proved guilty. ?♂️ Carnero, angieram and maxjam 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyler Durden Posted August 26, 2021 Share Posted August 26, 2021 Just now, Pearl Ram said: Just seen this on the Sky News ticker thing at the bottom of the screen. Not going to comment because I don’t know the facts however I do wonder if people charged on this kind of thing should remain anonymous until proved guilty. ?♂️ That's the perrenial debate....complainants anonymity guaranteed but the accused person's details are then totally in the public domain regardless of their guilt or not. therealhantsram and Pearl Ram 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BucksRam Posted August 26, 2021 Share Posted August 26, 2021 13 minutes ago, Pearl Ram said: Just seen this on the Sky News ticker thing at the bottom of the screen. Not going to comment because I don’t know the facts however I do wonder if people charged on this kind of thing should remain anonymous until proved guilty. ?♂️ Agree. Had several debates on this topic over the years. If he's found guilty then he absolutely deserves everything he gets. But until then he'll still be assumed guilty anyway until proven otherwise just by the way it's portrayed in the press. I know nothing, QuitYourJibbaJivin, Rammy03 and 2 others 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pearl Ram Posted August 26, 2021 Share Posted August 26, 2021 Got SSN on now and down the right hand side of the screen is a picture of him and a list of the charges. Now, if he is guilty, string him up by his privates by all means but if he’s not guilty...well, mud sticks doesn’t it ? Rammy03, therealhantsram and Day 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mostyn6 Posted August 26, 2021 Share Posted August 26, 2021 Always known for his attacking ability. Norman 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boycie Posted August 26, 2021 Share Posted August 26, 2021 Must be horrible to be accused of something like this and be innocent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyMac5 Posted August 26, 2021 Share Posted August 26, 2021 15 minutes ago, Boycie said: Must be horrible to be accused of something like this and be innocent. "The Crown Prosecution Service acknowledged that Mr Mendy has been charged in reference to allegations of sexual assault relating to 3 complainants over the age of 16 between October 2020 and August 2021." Innocent more than once it seems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dimmu Posted August 26, 2021 Share Posted August 26, 2021 3 hours ago, Pearl Ram said: Just seen this on the Sky News ticker thing at the bottom of the screen. Not going to comment because I don’t know the facts however I do wonder if people charged on this kind of thing should remain anonymous until proved guilty. ?♂️ Doubled-edged sword really. If he is innocent, then it's horrible for him. If he is not, then it's good to get it public as it might bring out more victims who have been quiet before. Ethically thinking it really is a tough one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pearl Ram Posted August 26, 2021 Share Posted August 26, 2021 Just now, Dimmu said: Doubled-edged sword really. If he is innocent, then it's horrible for him. If he is not, then it's good to get it public as it might bring out more victims who have been quiet before. Ethically thinking it really is a tough one. If he is guilty, by all means it should be made public but what if he is innocent ? Should his name have been put in the public domain ? I’m not sure. It’s not shoplifting we’re addressing here, it’s one of the most serious crimes a man can be accused of and so I wonder if anonymity should be the name of the game until proven guilty, that’s all. Stive Pesley, Dimmu, Tyler Durden and 1 other 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stive Pesley Posted August 27, 2021 Share Posted August 27, 2021 13 hours ago, Pearl Ram said: If he is guilty, by all means it should be made public but what if he is innocent ? Should his name have been put in the public domain ? I’m not sure. It’s not shoplifting we’re addressing here, it’s one of the most serious crimes a man can be accused of and so I wonder if anonymity should be the name of the game until proven guilty, that’s all. There is a strong case for the accused to remain anonymous (like the victims are) until proven guilty - but appreciate that is hard where it's someone famous and the public interest angle kicks in. Doesn't feel right though. Also wasn't there a Tory MP accused of rape last year but his name was never revealed? Or did I imagine that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pearl Ram Posted August 27, 2021 Share Posted August 27, 2021 3 minutes ago, Stive Pesley said: There is a strong case for the accused to remain anonymous (like the victims are) until proven guilty - but appreciate that is hard where it's someone famous and the public interest angle kicks in. Doesn't feel right though. Also wasn't there a Tory MP accused of rape last year but his name was never revealed? Or did I imagine that? I get what you are saying re the public interest angle. There is also the Internet speculation angle which we saw recently with an Everton player that was arrested for an under age offence who was not named publicly but was widely named on social media. I’m unaware of the Tory MP you refer to but wouldn’t be surprised if that was the case, some people have friends in higher places than others. It’s a difficult one alright and I’m in no way attempting to defend this man, I would just feel more comfortable if he (and all others accused of this kind of crime) remained anonymous until the legal procedure has taken it’s due course and has determined his/their innocence or guilt. Stive Pesley 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srg Posted August 27, 2021 Share Posted August 27, 2021 3 minutes ago, Pearl Ram said: I get what you are saying re the public interest angle. There is also the Internet speculation angle which we saw recently with an Everton player that was arrested for an under age offence who was not named publicly but was widely named on social media. I’m unaware of the Tory MP you refer to but wouldn’t be surprised if that was the case, some people have friends in higher places than others. It’s a difficult one alright and I’m in no way attempting to defend this man, I would just feel more comfortable if he (and all others accused of this kind of crime) remained anonymous until the legal procedure has taken it’s due course and has determined his/their innocence or guilt. Big difference here is that in the previous case, and likely this one, they can get named abroad anyway as their press isn't held to any of our regulation so the name is going to get out online regardless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stive Pesley Posted August 27, 2021 Share Posted August 27, 2021 The one and only good thing to come from this is that Laurence Fox has got himself banned from Twitter as a result Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pearl Ram Posted August 27, 2021 Share Posted August 27, 2021 2 minutes ago, Srg said: Big difference here is that in the previous case, and likely this one, they can get named abroad anyway as their press isn't held to any of our regulation so the name is going to get out online regardless. Oh well, disregard everything I’ve posted everybody, nothing to see here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkFruitsRam7 Posted August 27, 2021 Share Posted August 27, 2021 10 minutes ago, Stive Pesley said: The one and only good thing to come from this is that Laurence Fox has got himself banned from Twitter as a result Morgan, Farage, even Hopkins, I can just about deal with them (and when I say deal, I mean manage not to get wound up by them). For some reason Fox just sends me over the edge though. I try not to look at any of the stuff he says because it just winds me up. Mostly because I don't think he believes half of it himself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxjam Posted August 27, 2021 Share Posted August 27, 2021 1 hour ago, Stive Pesley said: The one and only good thing to come from this is that Laurence Fox has got himself banned from Twitter as a result FWIW, only his tweet was removed, he has attempted to justify his tweet on twitter this morning. The only really disappointing thing about his tweet I find is that as @Pearl Ram has alluded, he has judged Mendy guilty already - he may well be, but at least let justice take its course first. Pearl Ram 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mostyn6 Posted August 27, 2021 Share Posted August 27, 2021 I think a telling thing is there are multiple “alleged victims”, so unless they’re conspiring against him, you’d be more than inclined to think him guilty than if it were a single alleged victim. TigerTedd 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
therealhantsram Posted August 27, 2021 Share Posted August 27, 2021 2 hours ago, Stive Pesley said: Also wasn't there a Tory MP accused of rape last year but his name was never revealed? Or did I imagine that? You are absolutley right. It was very easy to figure out who it was because he didn't show up on the Commons for several months as his party suspended him pending investigation. But for whatever reason he wasn't allowed to be named in the media. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account.
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now