B4ev6is Posted August 24, 2021 Share Posted August 24, 2021 6 minutes ago, jimbobram said: Show us ? Look above he posted a picture of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BramcoteRam84 Posted August 24, 2021 Share Posted August 24, 2021 13 minutes ago, DCFC1388 said: Good work! ”revised and restated accounts”. That does not appear in any EFL statement. Sky clearly have their sources at the EFL, while we were playing against Peterborough they asked whether the EFL would allow a replacement for Kazim and they got a response which they shared after the game. They’ve probably followed this up and got this directly from the EFL. If that’s the case - then surely it’s over to the EFL now, Derby have done their bit. Rammy03 and r_wilcockson 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan_Ram Posted August 25, 2021 Share Posted August 25, 2021 1 hour ago, DCFC1388 said: More importantly, which team is that above that have a hologram amongst their 11? … and will we have to follow suit if we can’t strengthen before the deadline…? DCFC1388, GboroRam, Rammeister and 6 others 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Van der MoodHoover Posted August 25, 2021 Share Posted August 25, 2021 The choice of words in that Sky banner is interesting...assuming it's accurate of course. "Restated" implies we've just amended the amortisation numbers for straight line. "Revised and...." implies we may have made other amendments, perhaps around releasing some further profits from the previous stadium revaluation. If so, this might have been necessary to improve our ffp position and also would likely be the reason for the pre-submission dialogue with the EFL. Who says accountancy cannot be interesting? Such freedom and potential for skulduggery.... ? NottsRam77, Mick Brolly and RadioactiveWaste 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spanish Posted August 25, 2021 Share Posted August 25, 2021 14 hours ago, maxjam said: Not according to Nixon... What is required I believe is P&S summary to EFL and accounts files with coho with a copy to the league. They would normally get the summary first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyMac5 Posted August 25, 2021 Share Posted August 25, 2021 8 hours ago, BramcoteRam84 said: Good work! ”revised and restated accounts”. That does not appear in any EFL statement. Sky clearly have their sources at the EFL, while we were playing against Peterborough they asked whether the EFL would allow a replacement for Kazim and they got a response which they shared after the game. They’ve probably followed this up and got this directly from the EFL. If that’s the case - then surely it’s over to the EFL now, Derby have done their bit. I thought at the time when CKR got injured, who are they speaking with at the EFL. RadioactiveWaste 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hintonsboots Posted August 25, 2021 Share Posted August 25, 2021 20 minutes ago, RoyMac5 said: I thought at the time when CKR got injured, who are they speaking with at the EFL. Someone in Middlesbrough? RoyMac5, RadioactiveWaste and Rammeister 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ram-Alf Posted August 25, 2021 Share Posted August 25, 2021 33 minutes ago, RoyMac5 said: I thought at the time when CKR got injured, who are they speaking with at the EFL. RoyMac5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MackworthRamIsGod Posted August 25, 2021 Share Posted August 25, 2021 10 hours ago, RadioactiveWaste said: Wouldn't that have all been gone through in the orginal hearing (that we won?) - any question on that can be pointed back to the ruling with a note that the EFL did not appeal that part of the verdict. No, because this wasnt actually known until the last hearing where Stephen Pearson was said to have said "oh by the way, we realise we may have found 30 million down the back of the sofa, which we had forgotten about and would have done if it wasnt for all this pratting about" words to that effect anyway. RoyMac5 and RadioactiveWaste 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curtains Posted August 25, 2021 Share Posted August 25, 2021 The EFL are drawing this out to the point of tedium. Its just plain and simple bullying of Derby County. GenBr, Reggie Greenwood, Ellafella and 3 others 5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spanish Posted August 25, 2021 Share Posted August 25, 2021 2 minutes ago, Curtains said: The EFL are drawing this out to the point of tedium. Its just plain and simple bullying of Derby County. don't you think the club could have acted more quickly to present the info that was required, this seems to be going on a long time since the DC asked the club to restate, I would have thought the club would have anticipated this and have has a very good idea of how it looked weeks ago atherstoneram, mwram1973 and Norman 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curtains Posted August 25, 2021 Share Posted August 25, 2021 4 minutes ago, Spanish said: don't you think the club could have acted more quickly to present the info that was required, this seems to be going on a long time since the DC asked the club to restate, I would have thought the club would have anticipated this and have has a very good idea of how it looked weeks ago Have you heard the rumor about going into administration floating around again ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyMac5 Posted August 25, 2021 Share Posted August 25, 2021 8 minutes ago, Spanish said: don't you think the club could have acted more quickly to present the info that was required, this seems to be going on a long time since the DC asked the club to restate, I would have thought the club would have anticipated this and have has a very good idea of how it looked weeks ago Don't you think that getting an agreement about how we present the information would be important, particularly for the club going forward. That might take some time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spanish Posted August 25, 2021 Share Posted August 25, 2021 4 minutes ago, RoyMac5 said: Don't you think that getting an agreement about how we present the information would be important, particularly for the club going forward. That might take some time. yes Roy, but there is a perception that these delays are all down to the beastly EFL, maybe on this occasion it is not the whole truth? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Tibbs Posted August 25, 2021 Share Posted August 25, 2021 9 minutes ago, Curtains said: Have you heard the rumor about going into administration floating around again ! If so, your anger is being directed at the wrong people. Buck stops with the people currently at the club, not the EFL. Spanish 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spanish Posted August 25, 2021 Share Posted August 25, 2021 9 minutes ago, Curtains said: Have you heard the rumor about going into administration floating around again ! yeh, could be BS or on the money, time will tell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyMac5 Posted August 25, 2021 Share Posted August 25, 2021 2 minutes ago, Spanish said: yes Roy, but there is a perception that these delays are all down to the beastly EFL, maybe on this occasion it is not the whole truth? Never mentioned 'beastly' EFL, others might. It's clear from them allowing us to sign Baldock & Jags that they are being 'flexible'. r_wilcockson, Barney1991 and Spanish 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curtains Posted August 25, 2021 Share Posted August 25, 2021 2 minutes ago, RoyMac5 said: Never mentioned 'beastly' EFL, others might. It's clear from them allowing us to sign Baldock & Jags that they are being 'flexible'. No I don’t think they are being flexible at all. The players union would be on to them about that because of stopping players working ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyMac5 Posted August 25, 2021 Share Posted August 25, 2021 1 minute ago, Curtains said: No I don’t think they are being flexible at all. The players union would be on to them about that because of stopping players working ! They haven't because they can't. We play by EFL regulations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curtains Posted August 25, 2021 Share Posted August 25, 2021 Just now, RoyMac5 said: They haven't because they can't. We play by EFL regulations. Very short contracts These EFL regulations that are flexible. EFL flexible my arse Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account.
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now