Jump to content

Accounts Submission Date Extension


JfR

Recommended Posts

https://www.theguardian.com/football/football-league-blog/2021/aug/17/rooney-says-he-wont-make-excuses-but-Derby-are-in-an-impossible-mess
"The day did also represent a significant deadline: after being fined £100,000 for some of their accounting policies, specifically annual amortisation costs – how the club measure the value of players – Derby were ordered to resubmit their accounts for 2015-16, 2016-17, and 2017-18 by 18 August. That particular pressure was taken off the club on Tuesday afternoon, however, after the EFL granted them a six-day extension."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Derby Telegraph have a statement from the EFL here:
https://www.derbytelegraph.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/Derby-county-transfers-hull-jagielka-5795655

Not a great deal of information in it, but it's probably a positive thing that the EFL have stated that they've made the decision "following constructive discussions between the club and the EFL."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do we need an extension? These should have been prepared and ready to go long ago so we could get on with our season. 

One can only presume that we have agreed some sort of ‘deal’ with the EFL and are re-doing them on that basis but why has it taken so long? 
 

One can only be thankful that the club will no doubt be communicating the reason for this deferral, and the impact it may well have on signing any proper footballers before it is too late, in their usual timely and informative manner. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, JfR said:

https://www.theguardian.com/football/football-league-blog/2021/aug/17/rooney-says-he-wont-make-excuses-but-Derby-are-in-an-impossible-mess
"The day did also represent a significant deadline: after being fined £100,000 for some of their accounting policies, specifically annual amortisation costs – how the club measure the value of players – Derby were ordered to resubmit their accounts for 2015-16, 2016-17, and 2017-18 by 18 August. That particular pressure was taken off the club on Tuesday afternoon, however, after the EFL granted them a six-day extension."

We need to get the accounts in don’t we ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a palaver! It's normally us saying "there'll be no further comment" while previous EFL pronouncements have been extremely unprofessional. Who knows what this means? Clutching at straws I'd like to think the tight-lipped EFL response grudgingly accepts the accounts will be within limits so long as the auditors sign them off or something like that. 

(yet) another week before we might be closer to signing more players. This is kicking it ever closer until after the window closes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, RadioactiveWaste said:

My hunch is a face saving deal has been reached but that requires new audit sign off after changes, hence the extension and much less combative statement from the EFL.

That, or, the EFL didn't want my Hull City match day thread being hijacked by accounts news.

Flippin’ EFL...didn’t mention the Humber Bridge once. ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Steve Buckley’s Dog said:



One can only presume that we have agreed some sort of ‘deal’ with the EFL and are re-doing them on that basis but why has it taken so long? 

 

 

Surely: One can only presume they have NOT agreed any sort of deal. But that both parties want to avoid a dispute.

Otherwise an extension would not be required and would not have been agreed 

very bad for Rooney in terms of building a squad 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account.

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...